The Configuration among Social Capital, Distributive and Procedural Justice and Its Consequences to Individual Satisfaction

Heru Kurnianto Tjahjono

《International Journal of Information and Management Sciences》 22：1 (2011/03) Pp. 87-103

https://doi.org/10.6186/IJIMS.2011.22.1.6

並列摘要

The experiment study examined the influences of distributive justice and procedural justice on individual satisfaction. Social capital as moderating variable that influences the relationship among them. The relationship among between distributive and procedural justice and individual satisfaction based on the two factor model. The two factor model is a concept introduced by Sweeney and McFarlin (1993) who explained that distributive justice and procedural justice have a different influences on outcomes. In this research, focus on individual satisfaction. Distributive justice will be stronger to predict individual satisfaction compared to procedural justice. In fact that model is not always supported. This research explained that this model should be considered social capital as moderating variable, because social capital reflects subjective perspective.

並列關鍵字

Social capital ； distributive justice ； procedural justice ； individual satisfaction

參考文獻

(Ancok, D. Modal social dan kualitas Masyarakat. Pidato pengukuhan Guru Besar Fakultas Psikologi UGM dalam Rapat Majelis Guru Besar Terbuka Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 2003).

Faturochman, Keterkaitan Antara Anteseden Penilaian Keadilan Prosedural, Penilaian Keadilan Distributif Dan Dampaknya. Disertasi Program Doktor Psikologi UGM, 2002

Adler, P. S.,Kwon, S. W.(2002).Social capital: prospects for a new concept.Academy of Management Review.27(1),17-40.

Akdere, M.(2005).Social capital theory and implications for human resource development.Singapore Management Review.27(2),1-23.

Barling, J.,Philips, M.(1993).Interactional justice, formal and distributive justice in the workplace: an exploratory study.The Journal of Psychology.649(8),1-4.