透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.182.179
  • 期刊

全觀性美感體驗對學校教學意涵之探究

An Exploratory Study of the Implications of Holistic Aesthetic Experience for Teaching

摘要


本研究的宗旨乃是從「日常生活美學」運動所揭示的「尋常體驗遍是美感」觀點出發,以後設認知理論為主軸,整合自我決定等相關理論與實證研究暨中外教學現場之研究案例,綜整闡析美感體驗的全觀性質以及開放的心靈、興趣與關注、啟動想像力、探索與發掘、產生洞見等五項全觀性美感體驗要素在教與學上的意蘊。主張學習者若能經由教導者適當的全觀性美感體驗教學引導,藉互動性、動態性與多構面性之後設認知學習鷹架,以產生深層興味與自主性之轉化學習,將有助於學習效果之提升與生命意義之豐實。期盼此種跨領域、將理論融入日常生活實踐中的全觀性美感體驗視野能夠提供教師實務教學、強化學生學習效果以及我國美感教育政策制定若干參考意蘊。

並列摘要


This paper explains open-mindedness, interest and attentiveness, imaginative inspiration, exploration and discovery and insightful creation as five essential elements of holistic aesthetic experience, conducive to enhancement of teaching and learning performance in a variety of disciplinary subjects. In order to achieve this objective, this paper proceeds from the perspective of aesthetic experience pervasive in the ordinary espoused by the movement of aesthetics in everyday Life. The paper revolves around the metacognition theory to integrate conceptualizations and verifications pertinent to the self-determination theory alongside analysis of pedagogical cases. It is emphasized that the holistic nature of aesthetic experience emanates from metacognitive processes and intrinsic motivations to elicit cognitive, affective, imaginative and symbolic dimensions of beauty, leading students to move within and across various aesthetic fields of knowledge. The importance of metacognitive scaffolding is highlighted for facilitating students' holistic aesthetic experience as embedded in the aforesaid five elements. Metacognitive scaffolding, characteristic of interactivity, dynamicity and multiplicity, guides students to see through the ordinaries and appreciate the extra-ordinaries of knowledge culminating in holism of beauty. This paper points out that releasing the transformative power of the five elements of holistic aesthetic experience in everyday life stimulates aspiring students not only to excel in academic performance but also to seek a richer life meaning. Hopefully, this paper will provide some useful implications for educational policy-makers and teachers.

參考文獻


Desmet, P.,Hekkert, P.(2007).Framework of product experience.International Journal of Design.1(1),57-66.
Desmet, P.,Hekkert, P.(2007).Framework of product experience.International Journal of Design.1(1),57-66.
徐靜嫻(2006)。多元識讀與動畫敘事課程在國語文領統整中的應用:一個國語文領域統整課程發展之經驗分享。師大學報:人文與社會類。51(1, 2),55-77。
周淑卿(2010)。學習歷程中美感經驗的性質:藝術與科學課堂的探究。課程與教學季刊。14(1),19-40。
周淑卿(2005)。課程的美學探範疇之建構:當前的問題與未來的方向。課程與教學季刊。8(2),1-14。

被引用紀錄


廖昀靖(2016)。台灣文化政策中建構地方想像的美學方法—以「宜蘭村落美學」為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北藝術大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0014-1802201614444600
蔡昕璋(2017)。社區大學教師教學知能、美感素養與教學工作滿意度之關係研究:以臺北市社區大學為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北藝術大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0014-0507201702591600

延伸閱讀