透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.114.94
  • 學位論文

修復式正義應用於少年安置機構之研究

A STUDY OF THE APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN DELINQUENT YOUTH RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES

指導教授 : 黃富源
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


近年來,因為社會經濟環境之影響,導致許多破碎家庭的產生,及無助和失依的兒少需要政府的公權力介入。因此,國家視少年所需而依法協助,以保障其人身安全及提供了支持性、補充性與發展性服務。本研究目的在探討機構如何設計相關之方案或是哲學概念,運用修復式正義之概念,使安置機構之少年能藉由關係之修補,而降低未來非行行為或是使犯罪行為之減少,而證明少年之相關事件之處遇可以適用修復式正義之理念。因此,有下列四個重要之目的:一、探究「修復式正義」於少年安置機構可應用性之理論基礎。二、探究「修復式正義」應用在少年安置機構之服務模式之可行性。三、檢討「修復式正義」應用在少年安置機構之困難與改善策略。四、評估安置機構藉由關係修復後之工作效益影響。 本研究者要是以文獻分析法與參與觀察法為主要之研究方法。在文獻分析法中,研究者分析了修復式正義之相關理論與實證研究。此外,研究者已針對基督宗教與修復式正義之關連做一探討。在參與觀察的部分,研究者對於三個少年安置機構進行實地觀察,並進行假設之研究(一)修復式正義可以應用於少年安置機構。(二)修復式正義可以使少年安置機構之工作成效更佳。(三)少年安置機構之工作人員透過修復式正義,可以協助園生衝突事件或與園生家庭創傷之復原,以達爾後可以復歸於家庭、學校、社區及社會。 研究者針對社會福利機服務之重要元素,設計出參與觀察之八個向度以進行研究,再將修復式正義之向度關連及機構之工作效益進行交叉比較,得出結論:一、觀察三機構狀況,發現各機構或多或少都有應用於機構之方案或是輔導中,只是程度上之差異。或許觀察樣本不多,但是樣本於少年安置機構中似可運用。至於政府政策之宣導與執行不彰,也是無法有效推廣之主因之一。二、從參與觀察各向度分析機構應用修復式正義之關連性及效益部分,機構與修復式正義之關係越密切,其工作效益越高。三、信仰與修復式正義有差異,但可融合。四、將園生視為是加害者、被害者為個人與各社會機構,社區則由機構擔任之角色思考。五、司法轉向與保護性個案雖不同,但加害人與被害人皆可能有因果關係。建議:一、修復式正義有推廣之必要。二、觀察向度可成為未來欲進行相關研究時之參考工具。三、宗教信仰與修復式正義因有共同的精神與理念,故建議可融合,但是仍因注意其差異之所在。

並列摘要


In the recent years, the changes of socioeconomic environment have caused the increase in broken families and helpless children and youth who require interference of governmental authority. Our government has provided assistance under relative regulations to protect their personal safety, and supportive, complimentary, and developmental services. This study aimed to investigate how relative projects and philosophy concepts should be designed by facilities by adopting restorative justice to enable youths residing in delinquent facilities to reduce illegal or criminal practices through relation repair, and so verify that it is practical for management of relative events. This paper adopted research methods such as literature analysis and participant observation. In the sections of literature analysis methods, the researcher analyzed relative theories and empirical studies of restorative justice. In addition, the research also explored the relation between Christianity and restorative justice. In the sections of participant observation, the researcher conducted a field research on three residential facilities for delinquent youths and research of hypotheses that: (1) restorative justice is applicable for residential facilities for delinquent youths; (2) restorative justice enhances efficiency of residential facilities for delinquent youths; and (3) the staff of residential facilities for delinquent youths help youths to return families, schools, communities, and the society by assisting them in recovering from the conflict incidents and family traumas through restorative justice. The researcher designed eight dimensions for participant observation for this study, and then proceeded to cross-comparison between dimensional relation of the restorative justice and efficiency of the facilities. The results are: (1) In observation of the three facilities, each had more or less applied it to their projects or instructions, which varied to each other to some extent. Although sample size of observation was not large, they seemed applicable in the residential facilities for delinquent youths. Another major factor that it was not extensively employed was that the government did not successfully promote and execute this affair. (2) In analyzing the correlation and efficiency of each facility in applying restorative justice through each dimension of participant observation, it was found that the closer relation with the restorative justice the facilities had the more efficiency they performed. (3) Belief varied from the restorative justice, but they could consolidate. (4) Regarding roles assignment, the attenders of the facilities played the roles as offenders, the individuals and various social institutions took the victims, and the facilities took the communities. (5) Although cases of judicial diversion and protection were different, there may be causality between both the offenders and victims. Suggestions: (1) The necessity of promotion restorative justice exists. (2) Observation dimensions could become reference tools for relative researches in the future. (3) Belief of religion and restorative justice have same spirit and philosophy, it is recommended that they could combine. However, differences between them should be monitored.

參考文獻


莊凱琦,2007,《伴侶關係中的安全與自主:以留在施暴者身邊的受暴婦女為主體的服務反思》,臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
谷寒松,1996,<和好聖事>,收錄於輔仁神學著作編譯會《神學辭典》,民85,331-333頁。北市:光啟。
許春金,2006,《人本犯罪學》。台北:三民。
黃德祥,1994,《青少年發展與輔導》,台北:五南。
萬文隆,2004,<深度訪談在質性研究中的應用>。《生活科技教育月刊》,37-4:17-23。臺北:國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育學系。

被引用紀錄


黃聲豪(2014)。中小學教師對於運用修復式正義理念 處理學生衝突態度之研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613581824
許后宜(2016)。論修復式正義在校園霸凌事件之運用〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614042972
林鳳師(2017)。修復促進者主持修復會議之經驗研究〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-0401201816121133

延伸閱讀