透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.147.190
  • 期刊

《史記》表序與屬辭比事

The explaining by relevant comparison of the prefaces of ten forms in "Shi-Ji"

摘要


《史記》,為司馬遷私淑孔子,竊比《春秋》而成。其目的,在究天人之際,通古今之變,成一家之言。十表經緯時間與人物,補紀傳體之不足,是整部《史記》具體而微之縮影。表序原為闡釋十表而作,在古文選本的推波助瀾中,成為《史記》評點之焦點,各家說法不一。本文請循其本,以《春秋》屬辭比事角度切入,考察《史記》表序之其事、其文、其義。而得表序之比事,可以漢興為界:〈三代世表〉、〈十二諸侯年表〉、〈六國年表〉、〈秦楚之際月表〉四篇序,比事明確,以古喻今,提出王道之理想。漢興以後諸表,則以〈漢興以來諸侯王年表〉為核心,闡明王道當以仁義為本,其餘各表序為延伸說明。而各表序之間,更可透過兩兩對照,相互比事,觀察出太史公對當代的諫言與批判。故《史記》表序之屬辭比事,符合《春秋》隱桓之際則章,定哀之際則微之規律,而有太史公微言大義之寄託。

並列摘要


The writing methods of "Shi-Ji" imitate "Chun-Qiu" by Confucius. The most important way to read "Chun-Qiu" is explaining by relevant comparison. The form in "Shi-Ji" is another form of expression. Therefore, the prefaces of ten forms are important chapters of whole book. This study using explaining by relevant comparison, analyze the writing method of the prefaces of ten forms in "Shi-Ji". It explains Sima Qian's writing keynote lies in the comparison of the prefaces of ten forms in "Shi-Ji".

參考文獻


丁亞傑(2008)。朱子春秋學的衍異:方苞春秋學的創作意圖與意義解釋。中央大學人文學報。35,40。
張高評(2014)。比事屬辭與章學誠之《春秋》教:史學、敘事、古文辭與《春秋》書法。中山人文學報。36
(1982)。二十五史。北京:中華書局。
(2005)。文津閣《四庫全書》。北京:商務印書館。
(1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。

延伸閱讀