Have library access?
  • Journals
  • OpenAccess

Contested Theory in East Asia - A Case of Inter-determined Constitution of Proletariat in the 1920-1930s



This essay problematizes East Asia with theory by simultaneously problematizing theory itself. In such understanding, theory by nature is self-reflexive and self-contesting, ceaselessly questioning the legitimacy of established rules. Since theory remains the bearer of questions to all things it encounters (including itself), any attempt to provincialize theory (as European or as Asian), or to claim ownership over it with a national, racial, or civilizational identity would not be possible because theory is something other than itself and intrinsically aporetic. This paper takes the case of theory exchange in East Asia of the 1920s-30s in relation to the proletarian arts movement by looking at how the very meaning of "proletariat" is grasped in order to understand the contested nature of theory.

Parallel abstracts


Parallel keywords

理論 爭議 東亞 無產階級藝術運動


Balibar, Etienne,Swenson, James(Trans.)(1994).Masses, Classes, Ideas: Studies on Politics and Philosophy Before and After Marx.New York:Routledge.
Bowen-Struyk, Heather(2006).Guest Editor's Introduction: Proletarian Arts in East Asia.Positions: East Asia Cultural Critiques.14(2),251-78.
Duara, Prasenjit(2003).Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern.Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield.
Fan, Victor(2015).Cinema Approaching Reality: Locating Chinese Film Theory.Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P.
Hoston, Germaine A.(1986).Marxism and the Crisis of Development in Prewar Japan.Princeton:Princeton UP.