建築室內裝修材料會因表面貼覆壁裝材料而改變其耐燃性,特別是以壁紙、壁布所標榜耐燃壁裝材料而言,亦會使原裝修的基材耐燃等級降級;本研究乃針對經濟部增訂的「耐燃壁裝材料耐燃性能暫行規範」中所列的六類壁紙、壁布與市面常見的壁裝材料、三聚氰胺樹脂板與一般的木薄片,以不同基重、厚度與聚醋酸乙醯膠合劑塗布量,與該規範所規定之基板(纖維水泥板、石膏版),及其他氧化鎂板、木片水泥板與防焰合板加以複合,以表面試驗中耐燃三級加以檢測,以研究表面貼覆對室內壁裝材料燃燒特性之影響,結果如下列所示:1﹒防焰壁裝材料不一定為耐燃壁裝材料。如三聚氰胺樹脂板皆為防焰級材料,複合於石膏板上,皆無法通過耐燃三級;一般未耐燃處理之壁紙、木簿片反而可通過耐燃壁裝材的檢驗。2﹒耐燃壁裝材料隨厚度、基重與聚醋酸乙醯膠合劑塗布量會改變其耐燃性;若基材為不燃材料時,其厚度越薄、基重越小,反有利於耐燃等級的判定。3﹒壁裝材料黏覆於裝修材料時,推論可能會使整體材料之耐燃性降低,特別裝修材料為級外時、耐燃性之降低特別明顯。
The application of interior finishing materials, like wall paper and wall cloth, would downgrade the incombustibility of interior wallcovering materials. The goal of this study is to scrutinize the above pitfalls of "Temporary Guideline of Incombustibility for Interior Wallcovering Materials" promulgated by MOEA BSMI of ROC. Different interior wallcovering materials, including wall paper, wall cloth, melamine wafer, decorative veneer, etc., were applied on the variety of wall lining boards. Interior wallcovering materials were sorted by thickness, basis weight, amount of adhesive applied. The boards include: gypsum board, fiber cement board, magnesium oxide board, wood excelsior cement, and flame-retardant treated plywood. The main experimental results are summarized as follows: 1. Flame-resistant interior wallcovering materials, qualified in Merker's burner test (CNS 7614), did not necessarily qualify for fire-retardant materials (Grade III) in CNS 6532 test. For example. flame-resistant melamine veneer, passing Merkel、burner test, failed in CNS 6532 test while being applied on gypsum board. However, untreated wall paper and decorative veneer can pass the CNS 6532 test 2. Incombustibility of interior wallcovering materials was affected by their thickness, basis weight and adhesive applied. While being applied on fire-retardant boards, lesser thickness and basis weight help interior wallcovering materials meeting Grade III criteria. 3. While applied on wall lining boards, interior wallcovering materials and amount of adhesive dosage generally downgrade the incombustibility on final composites. The downgrading is especially significant for lining boards failing Grade III criteria.