透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.251.36
  • 期刊

International Anarchy in Perpetuity? A Re-Examination Based on the Perspectives of Classical Political Thinkers and Ancient Historical Experience

摘要


Structural realists, notably Waltz and Mearsheimer, have argued for the persistence of an anarchic international political system characterized by the absence of any centralized authority positioned above individual states. Mearsheimer has further suggested that a Sino-U.S. conflict is likely to occur in the future under conditions of anarchy. Based on the perspectives of classical realism. Chinese traditions, and relevant historical experience, we interrogate Mearsheimer's contention, arguing that hierarchies can thrive under conditions of international anarchy. Thus, international anarchy does not endure in perpetuity.

參考文獻


Acharya, A.(2014).Rethinking power, institutions, and ideas in world politics: Whose IR?.New York, NY:Routledge.
Ainslie, D. C.(1995).The problem of the national self in Hume's theory of justice.Hume Studies.21(2),289-314.
Akkermans, P. M. M.,Schwartz, G. M.(2004).The archaeology of Syria: From complex hunter-gatherers to early urban societies (c. 16,000-300 BCE).Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
Algaze, G.(1989).The Uruk expansion: Cross-cultural exchange as a factor in early Mesopotamian civilization.Current Anthropology.30(5),571-608.
Algaze, G.(2001).The prehistory of imperialism: The case of Uruk period Mesopotamia.Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: Cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation.(Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: Cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation).:

延伸閱讀