- 期刊
土木水利工程國際期刊排序
RANKINGS OF INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS IN CIVIL AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
摘要
近年來，國內學術界開始浮現不該以期刊影響因子為主要追求目標之看法，其中2021年土木水利工程學者發表「有關期刊聲譽的重要性」的聲明、指出期刊聲譽比期刊影響因子重要；2023年臺大醫學院研發分處發布「加強實質審查期刊」資訊、針對2類別期刊文章進行加強實質審查，並表明該學院不追求期刊影響因子。有鑑於此，本論文試圖根據國內外學者專家的意見量化期刊聲譽，論文中將土木水利工程期刊分為11個學術領域（力學、大地、水利、交通、材料、建築、測量、結構、鋪面、營管、土木跨領域），邀集國內外超過百名專家針對期刊的聲譽評分，根據專家評分結果得到各學術領域期刊的「聲譽排名」；也根據Journal Citation Report（JCR）數據得到各學術領域期刊的「指標排名」；最後，考量適當的「聲譽」與「指標」之間的權重得到「綜合排名」。分析結果發現「聲譽排名」與「指標排名」未呈現高度相關性；另外，臺大醫學院研發分處發布「加強實質審查期刊」資訊中提到的2類期刊之「聲譽排名」欠佳，代表國內外專家對此類期刊的評價普遍偏低。針對本論文中的期刊排名，以下是我們建議的使用方法：若較看重期刊於當代土木水利學者專家的認知，可以考量「聲譽排名」；若較看重期刊的JCR指標，則可考量「指標排名」，然而根據本文中的討論，我們建議JCR指標雖具有統計數據的參考性，仍應同時考量期刊聲譽；若欲平衡考量期刊聲譽與JCR指標的綜合結果，可以考量「綜合排名」。
關鍵字
無資料並列摘要
This paper attempts to quantify journal reputation based on the opinions of domestic and international scholars and experts. The paper categorizes civil and hydraulic engineering journals into 11 academic fields, inviting over a hundred experts to score the reputation of journals in each field. The "reputation ranking" of journals in each academic field is obtained based on expert ratings. Additionally, the "index ranking" of journals in each academic field is obtained based on Journal Citation Report (JCR) data. Finally, considering appropriate weights between "reputation" and "index," the "compound ranking" is determined. The analysis results reveal that the correlation between "reputation ranking" and "index ranking" is not high. Moreover, the "reputation ranking" of the two categories of journals mentioned in the information on "Enhancing Substantial Review of Journals" from the Branch Office of Research and Development at National Taiwan University College of Medicine is low, indicating these journals received consensus of generally low evaluations from domestic and international experts. This paper suggests following the "reputation ranking" if domain experts' opinions are valued. The "index ranking" could be used if JCR metrics are the sole focus. Although the JCR metrics represent reference value based on statistical data, we suggest still considering the academic reputation of journals. The "compound ranking" could be used to have a balance between reputation and journal index.