Beyond the Budapest School: György Markus in Sydney

布達佩斯學派之後：馬爾庫什在雪梨

John Grumley

《哲學與文化》 39卷3期 (2012/03) Pp. 39-65

https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.201203.0041

摘要

本論又探索後布達佩斯學派的企圖中，由馬爾庫什（György Markus）試圖發展之一種文化現代性的構成理論。自他在70年代末移居至澳洲的變遷著手，本文重建了他崇高企圖的主要元素，即他那探索了在科學、哲學，以及美術中自成一格的文化闕係之現代文化典範理論的企圖。由此我們能體會：他對現代啟蒙運動理論化的獨特貢獻、他將啟蒙運動和文藝復興態度這兩種悖論的統一體作為基本文化現代性之組成要素的理解，以及他自身建構一種對此挑戰能勢均力敵之哲學的計畫。

關鍵字

馬爾庫什 ； 文化現代性 ； 文化的二律背反 ； 布達佩斯學派 ； 啟蒙運動 ； 文化典範

並列摘要

This paper explores the post-Budapest attempt by György Markus to develop a theory of the constitution of cultural modernity. Commencing from the biography of his emigration to Australia in the late 1970's, it reconstructs the main elements of his novel attempt in terms of a theory of modern cultural pragmatics, which explores the sui generis cultural relations in science, philosophy and art. In this account we come to appreciate his distinctive contribution to contemporary theorization of Enlightenment and also his understanding of the anti-nomous unity of Enlightenment and Romantic attitudes as the basic constitutive elements of cultural modernity, as well as his own program for a philosophy equal to its challenges.

並列關鍵字

György Markus ； cultural modernity ； antinomies of culture ； Budapest School ； Enlightenment ； cultural pragmatics

參考文獻

Kis, János(2002).On Liberty: A Dispute with György Markus.Culture and Enlightenment: Essays for György Markus.(Culture and Enlightenment: Essays for György Markus).:

Markus, G.(1986).Language and Production: A Critique of Paradigms.Dordrecht:D. Reidel Publishing.

Markus, G.(1997).Do Ideas have Bodies? Literary 'Form' and Philosophical 'Content' in Descartes.Holmi.4,507-518.

Markus, G.(2011).Culture, Science and Society: The Constitution of Cultural Modernity.Leiden:Brill.