儒釋性論之辯：以羅欽順闢佛「以覺為性」為中心

Debate on the Nature Theory of Confucianism and Buddhism - Based on the Perspective of Confucianist Luo Qinshun Criticizing Buddhism "Consciousness is Nature"

陳思吟(Siyin CHEN)

《哲學與文化》 Volume 50 Issue 5 (2023/05) Pp. 183-196

Abstracts

自佛教傳入中土開始，儒家與佛教就不斷地爭鋒、交流和融合，心性論是儒家與佛教相互影響和爭論的重要領域。學界對儒釋心性論及其互動和同異已經有許多論述，但少有基於儒者闢佛視角的研究，尤其對宋明儒者自己總結的「以覺為性」等闢佛命題缺乏深入研究，然而該命題不僅凝結了儒者對儒釋性論差異的思考，更清晰地彰顯了儒釋性論的根本分野，通過對「以覺為性」的研究有助於更好地理解儒釋性論的內涵、異同以及局限性，啟發對人性更深刻的思考。

Keywords

以覺為性 ； 性 ； 道德 ； 儒家 ； 佛教

Parallel abstracts

Since Buddhism was introduced into China, Confucianism and Buddhism have been competing, communicating and integrating. The mind-nature theory is an important field of interaction and debate between Confucianism and Buddhism. There have been many discussions on the mind nature theory of Confucianism and Buddhism and its interaction, similarities and differences, but there are few studies based on the perspective of Confucianism criticizing Buddhism. In particular, there is a lack of in-depth research on the proposition of "consciousness is nature" summarized by the Confucians in the Song and Ming Dynasties. However, this proposition not only condenses the Confucians' thinking on the differences between Confucianism and Buddhism, but also clearly highlights the fundamental distinction between Confucianism and Buddhism. The study will help to better understand the connotation, similarities and differences and limitations of Confucianism and Buddhism, and inspire more profound thinking on human nature.

Parallel keywords

Consciousness is Nature ； Nature ； Morality ； Confucianism ； Buddhism

References

方立天，〈心性論——佛教哲學與中國固有哲學的主要契合點〉，《社會科學戰線》1(1993)。

方立天，〈儒家對佛教心性論的影響〉，《中華文化論壇》4(1995)。

方立天，〈儒、佛以心性論為中心的互動互補〉，《中國哲學史》2(2000)。

耿靜波，《北宋五子心性論與佛教心性論關係研究》，北京：中國社會科學出版社，2016。

耿靜波，〈陸王心學與早期禪宗心性論關係的再考察——以王陽明和神秀、慧能為中心〉，《雲南社會科學》1(2013)。