透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊

哲學諮詢和心理治療(諮詢)可以通約嗎?——以對心理治療(諮詢)時代難題的符號「診治」為例

Is It Commensurable between Philosophical Counseling and Psychotherapy (Counseling): the Symbolic "Diagnosis and Treatment" for Contemporary Problems of Psychotherapy (Counseling) as an Example

摘要


哲學諮詢和心理治療(諮詢)各自囿於思想分析層面或心理學概念,形成「通約困局」。將後者的時代難題設定為前者的工作對象,可揭示既往研究的局限:心理治療(諮詢)整合研究以多個因素或單個療法為起點,沒有超出實證層面;心理治療(諮詢)的全球化—本土化是個紛爭不斷的問題,但是,該問題雖源於直觀領域,相關紛爭卻在符號領域,而以往研究並未對此自覺區分。若想澄清紛爭,必須反諸符號。基於對這兩大難題的符號「診斷」,哲學諮詢可為心理治療(諮詢)理論與實踐的關係重新劃界。這也為两者的「通約」提供例示。

並列摘要


Philosophical counseling and psychotherapy (counseling) are confined to the level of thoughts analysis or psychological concepts respectively, resulting in an incommensurable predicament. By setting the latter's problems of the times as the object of the former, the limitations of previous researches are revealed: the explorations of psychotherapy (counseling) integration start from many factors or one therapy, thus don't go beyond the field of empirical research; the globalization-indigenization of psychotherapy (counseling) is a problem in disputes constantly. The problem, however, originates from the field of intuition, but the disputes over it are in the field of symbols. This distinction has not been made consciously before. Only if we ask help from symbols, can we clarify the disputes. Based on the "diagnosis and treatment" of these two problems in the symbolic field, philosophical counseling can redefine the relationship between theory and practice of psychotherapy (counseling). This also provides an example of the commensuration of the two.

參考文獻


布魯斯.E. 瓦姆博爾德,紮克.E. 艾梅爾,任志洪(譯)(2019).心理治療大辯論:心理治療有效因素的實證研究.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
陳斯琪,莊淑婕,章秀明,錢銘怡,楊晶晶,米田悅,萬巨玲,魏海洋,王家醇(2017).認知行為諮詢師和治療師工作狀況的初步訪談.中國心理衛生雜誌.31(1),46-51.
丁曉軍(2016).對話、分析與治療(博士論文).南京大學哲學系.
丁曉軍,喻豐(2020).「健康中國」背景下的哲學諮詢與治療.當代中國價值觀研究.5(1),94-104.
丁曉軍(2018).哲學何以治療——古希臘、古羅馬的哲學治療思想探微.蘭州學刊.2018(4),82-91.

延伸閱讀