支機集完帙之發現及其相關問題

《支機集》是明末蔣平階及其門人周積賢、沈億年三人的詞集，根據《中國古籍善本書目》所載，上海圖書館藏有「明萬曆刻本」，惜頗有殘缺，其他各館全無著錄。前此施蟄存先生在《詞學》刊布及上海古籍出版社《明詞彙刊》所收均據此本。筆者在研究蔣平階的過程中，在上海圖書館覓得另一本完帙的《支機集》。本文即是針對此書及其相關問題作研究。全文分為五節：一、《支機集》完帙本之發現經過。二、完帙本內容在研究上之重要性。三、有關蔣氏一門及其詞作之探討。前者為蔣氏一門師生及親族之關係的探討，以及蔣氏名號、籍貫及生平事跡之考訂；後者除討論蔣氏父子及門生之詞作及其詞論在當時詞壇之影響外，另從清初詞選中補充若干《支機集》未收之作品。四、此書對雲間派詞論研究之助益。一方面討論其理論體系，一方面也指出其重寄託、專意小令等論詞宗旨，其實均與其歷經世變之背景息息相關。五、結語。文未另附列各書引錄蔣氏一門詞作之情形，並比較其異同。

關鍵字

清詞；支機集；雲間詞派；蔣平階；周積賢；沈億年

並列摘要

”Chih-chi chi” is a ”tz'u” poetry collection by Chiang P'ing-chieh and his students, Chou Chi-hsien and Shen I-nien, of the late Ming. The only known copy of this book, in the Shanghai Library holdings and documented in ”Chung-kuo ku-chi shan-pen shu-mu” (A Bibliography of Chinese Ancient Rare Books), was that of the Wan-li edition. This copy, regrettably, does not exist in a complete form. What Mr. Shi Zhicun once published in the journal ”Tz'u-hsüeh” , and the version inc1uded in the ”Ming-tz'u hui-k'an” published by Shanghai Ku-chi Ch'u-pan-she are based on this version. In the process of studying Chiang P'ing-chieh, I discovered another copy of ”Chih-chi chi”, also in the collections of the Shanghai Library. This paper is a study of this rare book and its related issues.This paper consists of five sections: the first section reports the discovery of the complete version of ”Chih-chi chi”, and the second evaluates the importance of the contents of this book. The third section examines 1) the ”tz'u” poetry school led by Chiang, and 2) the ”tz'u” poetry of Chiang and his followers. I explore Chiang's family and social networks and ascertain Chiang's names, place of origin, and the major events surrounding Chiang's life. More importantly, I assess the influence of Chiang and his students' ”tz'u” works and the significance of their theory in the contemporary literary world. I also present some of Chiang's works that are not included in ”Chih-chi chi”. The fourth section is an analysis of this rare book's contribution to the study of the Yün-chien ”tz'u” school. I analyze its theoretical values. I point out that its emphasis on allegory and ”hsiao-ling” (short ”tz'u” poem) form is closely related to the political turmoil that Chiang experienced during the Ming-Ch'ing transition. The final section is the conclusion, to which is attached a chart showing how Chiang and his school's works are quoted in other books. A comparison and analysis of these materials is offered.