Jones Dye Test與Fluorescein Dye Disappearance Test的再評估

Reappraisal of Jones Dye Test and Fluorescein Dye Disappearance Test

陳彥志(Yen-Zih Chen) ； 高啓祥(Chie-Shung Kao) ； 林素玲(Su-Ling Lin)

《中華民國眼科醫學會會刊》 28卷1期 (1989/05) Pp. 377-382

https://doi.org/10.30048/ACTASOS.198905.0069

摘要

對一般眼科門診時常遭遇到的主訴流淚的患者，應如何以簡便有效的方法測試？本篇收集無症狀的三十人（六十眼）施以Jones Dye Test與Fluorescein Dye Disappearance Test評量它們的可行性，正確性及彼此的關聯。Jones Ⅰ染料試驗的陽性率可達86.7%，然而Fluorescein Dye Disappearance Test的陽性率卻高達95.3%，前者有直接證據但是後者卻屬間接觀察，但兩者皆不失為評估排淚功能簡易而有效的方法。

並列摘要

We Studied 30 randomly selected individuals without epiphora. Jones dye test and Fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT) were performed and evaluated. Among 60 eyes, only 1 eye (1.7%) was regarded as negative in FDDT while 8 eyes (13.3%) were negative in Jones Ⅰ dye test.
However, none was negative in Jones Ⅱ test. We also concluded that Subjects whose Basal Secretion test values are over 10mm/5min have Statisticably higher positive rate in Jones Ⅰ test than those under l0min/5min.
The Study suggests that Jones Ⅰ test remains the most important screening test for assessment of lacrimal excretion, however, FDDT can be given as an adjunct for its high sensitivity and rapid interpretation.

並列關鍵字

Jones Dye Test ； Fluorescein Dye Disappearance Test ； Lacrimal Pump ； Epiphora