透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊

白人與長馬-《孟子•告子上》「食色性也」章的分析

White Man and Old Horse

摘要


本主是《孟子•告子上)「食色性也」章的重新詮釋。通過語言的分析,以澄清辯論的重點,從而發掘告子在道德哲學上主張客觀的自然主義,以及孟子在道德哲學上反對客觀的自然主義和情緒主義的立場。

並列摘要


This paper is a re-interpretation of the chapter four of the first half of 'Kao Tze, in ”Mencius”. The main points and their philosophical significance of the argument between Mencius and Kao Tze in this chapter are clarified through philological and linguistic analyse. Kao Tze's inclination to ethical objective naturalism and Mencius' opposition to both objective naturalism and emotivism are shown as the result of such analyse.

參考文獻


Hare, M. R.(1963).Freedom and Reason .
R. M.Hare,Hare(1952).Language of Morals .
Raphael, D. D.(1994).Moral Philosophy .
岑溢成(1988)。「生之謂性」釋論。鵝湖學誌。1

被引用紀錄


蔡宜汎(2012)。王船山《讀四書大全說》之孟學研究〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-1903201314433174

延伸閱讀