透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.156

摘要


目的:對現行急診檢傷分類系統進行評分者間信度評估。 方法:蒐集自民國90年1月1日至92年12月31日止急診檢傷資料,以系統抽樣後進行病歷與電腦資料之比對。 結果:在1541份樣本中,急診醫師與檢傷護理人員給予71.3%病患一致的檢傷等級,其評分者間信度的原始值及二次方值分別為0.25與0.36;依病人年齡分組後,兒科組分別為0.27及0.38,成人組則各為0.24與0.36。以急診醫師的檢傷分類結果來預測病人住院較急診護理人員之準確性超過兩倍。 結論:現行台灣急診檢傷分類系統,在不同專業間之信度不良,未來需針對同一專業及不同專業間之信效度進行深入分析。

關鍵字

急診 信度 檢傷分類

並列摘要


Background: This study evaluated the inter-rater reliability of nurse to physician using the current national Taiwan triage scale, a 4-level triage system. The scale's validity was also assessed by comparing emergency department (ED) length of stay and hospital admission rates for both pediatric and adult patients based on their triage score. Methods: Triage nurses (TNs) documented their patient assessments in writing on a nursing chart. Emergency physicians (EPs) entered a triage score directly into the computer record for each patient encounter. Triage data from the two sources for the period from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003 were used for analysis. A systematic sampling method using a 100:1 ratio was employed to select the study subjects. The extracted chart and computer log data were then compared. Results: Among the 1541 patients sampled, the overall agreement between EPs and TNs was 71.3%, with unweighted and quadratic weighted kappa values of 0.25 and 0.36, respectively. When stratified by age, the unweighted and quadratic weighted kappa values for the pediatric patients were 0.27 and 0.38, and for the adult patients were 0.24 and 0.36, respectively. The odds ratio for admission rate prediction by triage category was more than twice as high for EPs than TNs. Conclusion: The study revealed poor inter-rater reliability between nurses and physicians using the Taiwan triage scale. Future studies need to focus on inter-rater reliability within the same provider groups to determine what improvements are required.

並列關鍵字

emergency department reliability triage

延伸閱讀