中國人稱日本為「扶桑」晚於唐朝

Chinese Name Japan "Fu Sang" after Tang Dynasty

朱介國(Jie-Guo Zhu)

《中國文化大學中文學報》 20期 (2010/04) Pp. 113-132

https://doi.org/10.29989/ZGWHDXZWXB.201004.0005

摘要

本文乃針對初國卿〈稱日本為「扶桑」始於唐代〉一文與夏洛特（Charlotte Von Verschuer）在〈唐・宋における日本蓬莱觀と水銀輸入について〉一文裡提出「東海觀與日本觀共存於扶桑一詞的情況，中國早於日本」的觀點，進行探討。筆者從中國與日本的古籍裡搜尋相關資料，以從事反駁的工作，旨在辨明唐人並未以扶桑稱日本，反而以之指新羅。以扶桑稱日本，乃日本人自為之事，中國人在此風盛行之後才跟進，時間乃在北宋之時。然而中國人形成以扶桑稱日本的共識，應在明代之後。

關鍵字

扶桑 ； 扶木 ； 日本 ； 新羅 ； 倭國 ； 唐代

並列摘要

This article is written to counter Chu Guo Qing's paper ”The Movement of Naming Japan 'Fu Sang' Began in Tang Dynasty” and the viewpoint Charlotte Von Verschuer addressing in his essay that the situation of Tonghaiguan and Ribenguan coexisting in the term ”Fu Sang” appeared earlier in China than in Japan. I kept searching relative data in the classics of China and Japan to carry out the work of controverting in order to make clear the fact that Chinese in Tang Dynasty never named Japan Fu Sang and they gave this name to Silla instead. The people who called Japan Fu Sang were Japanese themselves. Chinese just followed them after this established practice had prevailed in Japan and it happened in Bei Song Dynasty. Even so, after Ming Dynasty did the Chinese people then gradually form the common view of naming Japan Fu Sang.

並列關鍵字

Fu Sang ； Fu Mu ； Japan ； Silla ； Woguo ； Tang Dynasty

參考文獻

楊家駱編(1987)。新校本後漢書井附編十三種。台北:鼎文書局。

何英德(2000)。從銅鏡等文物看中日文化交流。北京文博。2000(1)，74。

王元化(1994)。思辦隨筆。上海市:上海文藝出版社。

初國卿(1999)。稱日本的「扶桑」始於唐代。文學遺產。1999(6)，93。

陳尚君輯校(1992)。全唐詩補編。北京市:中華書局。