- 期刊
- Ahead-of-Print
歸屬需求量表中文化編製與法則網絡
The Validation and Nomological Network of the Chinese Version Need to Belong Scale
摘要
緒論：歸屬需求是人的基本心理需求之一，而身體活動提供了經由人際互動以滿足歸屬需求的情境，因此欲了解個體參與身體活動的行為，歸屬需求是值得探討的重要心理因子。本研究旨將Leary及其同儕（Schreindorfer & Leary, 1996;Leary et al.,2013）所發展的歸屬需求量表（Need to belong scale）中文化並進行信、效度和法則網絡的檢驗，以利後續在台灣及華人社會中進行相關的研究探討。方法：研究一以探索性因素分析、項目分析和再測檢驗，檢視中文版歸屬需求量表的因素結構、題項鑑別度、內部一致性及再測信度。研究參與者為177位一般民眾（76男，Mage=25.20歲，SD=8.94歲）。研究二進一步以驗證性因素分析、恆等性檢驗與法則網絡檢驗中文版歸屬需求量表的模式適配度、恆等性、建構效度及效標關聯效度，研究參與者為314名一般民眾（男130，Mage=38.77歲，SD=10.06歲）。結果：研究一的統計分析結果支持了中文版歸屬需求量表的單一結構、良好的題項鑑別度與再測信度。研究二的驗證性因素分析與法則網絡的結果進一步驗證了中文版歸屬需求量表具良好的建構效度、鑑別度及效標關聯效度。在法則網絡的檢驗上，歸屬需求對神經質與外向性的人格特質具有不同相關，正向預測個體的自尊但又與寂寞感受不一致，行為表現上則顯示出歸屬需求越高者獨自活動的比例較低，且獨自從事活動時容易有負面感受。結論：經本研究中文化過程之歸屬需求量表具良好的基本信、效度，應適合於華人社會進行後續相關研究。
並列摘要
Introduction: Need to belong is one of the basic psychological needs of humans, and physical activities provide the contexts in which need to belong can be satisfied through interpersonal interactions. Therefore, to have a better understanding of physical activity participation, need to belong is an important psychological factor to be systematically studied. The purpose of this study was to develop a Chinese version of the Need to belong scale (Schreindorfer & Leary, 1996; Leary et al., 2013), via reliability, validity, and nomological network investigation, for future need to belong research in Taiwanese and Chinese-related cultural society. Method: In study 1, the original scale items were translated and back-translated. Exploratory factor analysis, item analysis and test-retest measures were conducted based on data from 177 participants (76 male, Mage = 25.20, SD = 8.94). In study 2, a total of 314 participants (130 male, Mage = 38.77, SD = 10.06) filled in the Chinese version scale. Confirmatory factor analysis, invariance test as well as nomological network approach were utilized to examine the fitness of model, gender-invariance, construct, and criterion-related validities of the scale. Results: The results of study 1 provided preliminary evidences of a single factor structure of the scale, item discrimination, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. In study 2, the confirmatory factor analysis and nomological network examination confirmed the construct and criterion-related validity and provided further evidences of the psychometric properties of the Chinese version need to belong scale. The nomological network showed that need to belong was associated differently with various personalities and was positively correlated to self-esteem and loneliness to different extent. In terms of behaviors, people who were high in need to belong were correlated with low frequency to engage in solitary activities and tended to have negative emotion when being alone. Conclusions: The Chinese version need to belong scale showed good estimates for reliability and validity, and appeared to be suitable tool for further research in Taiwanese and Chinese society.