透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.90.182
  • 期刊

負面黨性與投票抉擇:2004-2020年臺灣總統選舉的分析

Negative Partisanship and Voting Choice: The Case of Presidential Elections in Taiwan, 2004-2020

摘要


以前臺灣在政治精英之間才出現的對立,已延伸到一般群眾裡。尤其在總統選舉時,選民之間以情感而非政策立場的對立,已影響臺灣過去五屆總統選舉的結果。本文以「負面黨性」作為觀察臺灣社會「情感極化」的指標,佐以2004至2020年總統選舉,檢證負面黨性對臺灣總統選舉結果的作用。我們發現自2012年開始,對於特定政黨具有負面黨性的選民,百分比呈現大幅上升的趨勢,在2020年總統大選時,已有4成的國民黨和民進黨支持者對敵對政黨有負面黨性,同時給予敵對政黨有史以來最低分。另一方面,即使控制政黨認同及統獨立場,負面黨性對臺灣選民的投票抉擇仍具有顯著的解釋力。也就是說,投票給某一政黨總統候選人的決定,不僅取決於對該政黨的認同,或對其政策的支持,選民對敵對政黨是否具有負面的評價也成為一項關鍵指標。

並列摘要


The bitter rivalries that used to occur only among political elites have now reached the everyday lives of the mass public. In particular, the results of presidential elections have been driven as much by affective conflict between partisans as by policy debates. The present study explores affective polarization in Taiwan through negative partisanship. Data from presidential elections between 2004 and 2020 provide evidence for the effect of negative partisanship on election results. The study found that starting in 2012, there has been a rapid increase in negative views among partisans in both main parties toward the opposing party. In the 2020 presidential election, more than 40% of both Kuomintang (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) supporters showed negative partisanship towards the opposing party. Furthermore, supporters of both parties had the lowest ever favorability scores for the opposing party. Even when traditional party identification and support for independence or reunification are controlled, negative partisanship still has significant explanatory power. The decision to vote for a candidate from a particular party in presidential elections depends not only on one's long-term identification with that party but also on whether one harbors a strong negative opinion towards the opposing party.

參考文獻


朱雲漢,2012,《2009年至2012年「選舉與民主化調查」三年期研究規劃(3/3):2012年總統與立法委員選舉面訪案》,計畫編號:NSC 100-2420-H-002-030,台北:行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。(Chu, Yun-han. 2012. “2009 nain zhi 2012 nain ‘Xuan ju yu min zhu hua diao cha’ san nian qi yan jiu gui hua: 2012 nian zong tong yu li fa wei yuan xuan ju mian fang an” [Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study, 2009-2012 (III): the Survey of Presidential and Legislative Elections, 2012 (TEDS2012)]. NSC 100-2420-H-002-030. Taipei: National Science Council Research Project Report.)
朱雲漢,2020,《全球化的裂解與再融合:中國模式與西方模式誰將勝出?》,台北:遠見天下文化。(Chu, Yun-han. 2020. “Quan qiu hua de lie jie yu zai rong he: zhong guo mo shi yu xi fang mo shi shei jiang sheng chu” [The Future of Globalization: Fisson vs. Fusion].Taipei: Commonwealth Publishing Group.
包正豪,2013,〈政黨認同與投票抉擇〉,陳陸輝(編),《2012年總統與立法委員選舉 : 變遷與延續》,台北:五南出版。(Pao, Cheng-hao. 2013. “Zheng dang ren tong yu tou piao jue ze” [Party Identification and Vote Choice]. In “2012 nian zong tong yu li fa wei yuan xuan ju: bian qian yu yan xu” [2012 Presidential and Legislative Yuan Elections in Taiwan: Change and Continuity], ed. Lu-huei Chen. Taipei: Wunan.)
李弘繹、張佑宗,2020,〈負面黨性與2020年台灣總統大選〉,2020年台灣政治學會年會暨「全球民主退潮?政治學的反思與應對」國際學術研討會論文,12月5-6日,台北:臺灣大學。(Lee, Hung-I, and Yu-tzung Chang. 2020. “Fumian dangxing yu 2020 Taiwan zongtong daxuan” [Negative Partisanship and the 2020 Presidential Election in Taiwan]. Presented at the 2020 Annual Conference of Taiwanese Political Science Association, December 5-6, Taipei.)
侯文詠,2004,《侯文詠極短篇》,台北:皇冠出版。(Hou, wen-yong. 2004. “Hou Wen-yong ji duan pian” [Hou Wen-yong Short Stories]. Taipei: Crown.)

延伸閱讀