透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.117
  • 期刊

非與選舉同時的公投參與:比較台灣2018年與2021年兩次公投

Turnout of Referendum Without Concurrent Elections: A Comparison of 2018 and 2021 Referenda in Taiwan

摘要


本研究探討台灣在2018年與2021年的兩次公投從同時選舉到非同時選舉的制度改變,產生的投票率變化。本文發現,與大選脫鉤後,公投投票率與青年人口比的相關方向出現逆轉:2018年,青年人口比較高的地區投票率較高;2021年則是青年人口比較低的投票率較高。此外,高教人口比與縣市的執政黨做為本研究之控制變數,控制後,青年人口比與投票率仍維持逆轉。當公投不綁大選後,青年人口比越高,投票率越低;而高教人口比對投票率則不顯著;對比非民進黨執政縣市的投票率變化,2021年民進黨執政縣市則是顯著的增加,代表公投大選脫鉤,執政黨反而積極動員;同意票的分析則顯示了投票率促進同意票,但在脫鉤一般選舉降低投票率下,同意票比例也跟著下降。

並列摘要


This study examines the shifts in voter turnout during Taiwan's two referenda in 2018 and 2021, resulting from the transition from concurrent elections to separate ones. The research reveals a relationship between referendum turnout and the percentage of young voters when they are no longer held concurrently with general elections. In 2018, regions with a higher proportion of young voters experienced higher participation in referenda, whereas in 2021, areas with a lower percentage of young voters displayed increased turnout. Furthermore, even after controlling for the level of higher education among the population and the political party in power at the town levels, an inverse relationship between the proportion of young voters and turnout remained consistent. When referenda were decoupled from general elections, a higher percentage of young voters was associated with lower overall turnout, and the relationship between higher education and turnout was found to be insignificant. When comparing changes in turnout between cities not governed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), a significant increase in turnout was observed in DPP-led areas in 2021. This suggests that when referenda were decoupled from general elections, the ruling party became more proactive in mobilizing voters. Furthermore, an analysis of approval votes indicates that higher turnout encourages more approval votes. However, in the context of reduced turnout during non-concurrent elections, the proportion of approval votes also decreased accordingly.

參考文獻


中央選舉委員會,2021,〈選舉資料庫〉,中選會選舉資料庫網站:https://db.cec.gov.tw/Referendum?type=National,檢索日期:2022年8月9日。(Central Election Committee. 2021. “Xuan ju zi liao ku” [Election Database]. Central Election Committee Database. https://db.cec.gov.tw/Referendum?type=National (accessed August 9, 2022).)
內政部戶政司,2021,〈人口統計資料〉,內政部戶政司全球資訊網站:https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346,檢索日期:2022年8月9日。(Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior. 2021. “Ren kou tong ji zi liao” [Demographic Database]. Department of Household Registration Database. https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346 (accessed August 9, 2022).)
王鼎銘,2007,〈成本效益、公民責任與政治參與:2004年公民投票的分析〉,《東吳政治學報》,25(1): 1-38。(Wang, Ding-ming. 2007. “Cheng ben xiao yi, gong min ze ren yu zheng zhi can yu:2004 nian gong min tou piao de fen xi” [Cost Benefit, Civic Duty, and Political Participation: An Analysis of the Referendum in 2004]. Soochow Journal of Political Science 25(1): 1-38.)
台灣民意基金會,2021,〈2021年11月全國性民意調查摘要報告〉,財團法人台灣民意基金會網站:https://www.tpof.org/2%E6%9C%88%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E6%9C%83%E6%9B%B8%E9%9D%A2%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99v3-2/#1643018950949-d9db1dbb-08b0,檢索日期:2022年8月9日。(Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation. 2021. “2021 nian 11 yue quan guo xing min yi diao cha zhai yao bao gao” [November 2021 Public Opinion Poll - English Excerpt]. Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation. https://www.tpof.org/2%E6%9C%88%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E6%9C%83%E6%9B%B8%E9%9D%A2%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99v3-2/#1643018950949-d9db1dbb-08b0 (accessed August 9, 2022).)
李俊達,2009,〈歐洲國家公民投票經驗之跨國比較:議題、時程與結果〉,《東吳政治學報》,27(1): 53-121。(Lee, Chun-ta. 2009. “Ou zhou guo jia gong min tou piao jing yan zhi kua guo bi jiao: yi ti shi cheng yu jie guo” [The Comparison of Referendum in European Democracies: Issues, Timings and Results]. Soochow Journal of Political Science 27(1): 53-121.)

延伸閱讀