透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.14.150.165
  • 期刊

The Prospect of an Independent Enterprise under UNCLOS 1982: A Study on the Sound Commercial Principles Fulfillment

摘要


United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 envisioned that the Enterprise would allow indirect participation of the developing states to engage in deep seabed mining without the barriers of capital and technology. The Implementing Agreement 1994 to the UNCLOS 1982 required the operationalization of the Enterprise must fulfill one of two prerequisites, namely the approval of an exploitation plan of work or the approval for a joint venture proposal with the Enterprise. However, fulfilling one of the prerequisites is not adequate as there is no certainty that the Enterprise can operate effectively. UNCLOS 1982 required that the Enterprise operates based on sound commercial principles. However, the sound commercial principles have never been officially explained or interpreted. It is necessary to have clear parameters in the sound commercial principles and their fulfillment prospects. After the International Seabed Authority (ISA) approves the exploitation mining code, the seabed mining industry will soon proceed to the exploitation phase. The start of the exploitation phase would indicate that one of the prerequisites for the operationalization of an independent Enterprise would soon be met. This article attempted to identify the elements that make up the sound commercial principles by analyzing their meanings based on historical studies from the negotiation of UNCLOS 1982 and current practices. This study concluded that there are two vital elements of the principles. These two elements are the independent and commercial sustainability of the Enterprise. The independent characteristics of the Enterprise must apply to all its organs to not be subjected to the interests of any state. The commercial sustainability of the Enterprise depends on two equally vital components, namely technological and financial capabilities. Based on these two elements, the authors identified conditions that would prevent the fulfillment of sound commercial principles. Among the issues identified by the authors are the unclear internal affairs between the Board and the Director-General and the financing for the Enterprise's early operations and upfront expenditures.

參考文獻


Feichtner, Isabel. “Sharing the Riches of the Sea: The Redistributive and Fiscal Dimension of Deep Seabed Exploitation.” European Journal of International Law 30, no. 2 (2019): 601-633. doi:10.1093/ejil/chz022
Moses, Jonathon W. and Anne Margrethe Brigham. “Whose benefit? A comparative perspective for the ISA.” Marine Policy 131, (September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104550
Valsangkar, Anil B. “Deep-Sea Polymetallic Nodule Mining Challenges Ahead for Technologists and Environmentalists.” Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 21, no. 2 (2003): 81-91. DOI: 10.1080/716100481.
Wang, Chuanliang, and Chang, Yen-Chiang. “A new interpretation of the common heritage of mankind in the context of the international law of the sea.” Ocean and Coastal Management 191, (June 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105191
Willaert, Klaas. “Deep sea mining and the United States: Unbound powerhouse or odd man out?” Marine Policy 124, (February 2021): 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104339

延伸閱讀