摘要
漢賦作為一代文學，自有不可抹滅的土也位，卻往往被批評為形式主義文學、歌功頌德之作，其中，對漢賦「諷諫」的討論也出現相當紛歧的觀點，或謂其乃為賦的重要義法，或說諷揀造成漢賦評價不高。本文首先定義「諷諫」、「諷諭」之異同，並針對此一名詞進行探源：所謂「諷諫」的觀念，從《詩經》至賦一脈相承，受漢儒教化觀，之影響而益盛，進而探討司馬遷、揚雄、班回等人的賦論，以呈現漢人諷諫之說；第三節從近人對揚雄所謂「勸百諷一」的解讀，釐清漢賦「沒其諷諭之義」－漢賦諷揀效果不彰的因由，實為文體演變，時勢所造成，並得《文心雕龍》所論為義法「體物寫志」、「鋪采摛文」之關餘，當為：同時存在，交輔為用，更以諷為重；最後一節由「經學籍制文學」的角度之外，重新再議漢賦「諷諫」之價值。
並列摘要
Considered as classic literature, Han Fu (a genre of literature in Han Dynasty) is in an irreplaceable position in history. However, it was alsocriticized as formalistic literature or works of eulogy. Besides, there are many different viewson discussing the '' fengjian (to satirize and admonish)＂ part of Han Fu. Some think that ''feng jian＂ is a very important method for writing Fu, others thinkthat ＂fengjian＂ makesHan Fu belowly valued. This paper, first, distinguishes ＂fengjian＂ from ＂feng yu,＂ and discusses it further as follows: The concept of so-called ''feng jian＂ camefrom＂ Shiling＂ (The Book of Songs), was followed by Fu, and then developed with the influence of Confucianism in Han Dynasty. Secondly, the paper discusses some Fus written by Si Ma-auian, Yang Xiong, and Ban Qu to present the works about ＂feng jian＂ in Han Dynasty. Moreover, from the modem interpretation of ＂quan bai feng ji'' presented by Yan Xiong, the paper clarifies what Yan expressed that Han Fu decayed the existence of ''feng jian.＂ Furthermore, the findings of this partare: Because of the development of literal genre and time, ＂fengjian＂ becameweak in Han Fu. In addition, ＂te wu xie zhi＂ and ＂pu xai chi wen,＂ whose relationships were discussed in WenXin Diao Long, should co-exist and complete each other, and ''feng jian is just attached a little more importance, Out of the view of that ＂Confucianism limits literature,＂ the lastpartof thispapergives a new definition fromanother viewto the value of ＂fengjian＂ in HanFu.