「嚇阻」與「防衛」：概念的異同性

Concepts of Deterrence and Defense: Similarity and Difference

陳偉華

《國防雜誌》 25卷2期 (2010/04) Pp. 27-40

https://doi.org/10.6326/NDJ.2010.25(2).3

摘要

批判戰略研究為假議題的後冷戰時期，「嚇阻」研究成為眾矢之的，其中核子嚇阻更是污名化為無法實證的假科學，眾多戰略研究者紛紛轉戰安全研究，媚俗性的追求國際潮流，或者倡言國際社會已低度化戰爭的可能性，國家安全項下的「嚇阻」與「防衛」研究，日益邊緣化。本文研究發現，無論國際潮流如何反軍事風尚，或者低估戰略研究的重要性，但國家安全的無可替代性，並不因國際合作蓬勃發展而遞減。以故，以「嚇阻」與「防衛」立基的國防，仍具研究價值，亦需進一步證成其功能所在。

關鍵字

戰略研究 ； 嚇阻

並列摘要

In the Post-Cold War era, critics argued that Strategic Studies had been working on false issues and the topic of deterrence was the major blame for its incompetence of testability, particularly the question of nuclear deterrence. Many scholars, under such circumstances, have switched their research from Strategic study to Security study, with the statement of highly impossible of major wars in international society. This has rendered peripheral of both ”deterrence” and ”defense” studies under the name of national security. This study shows that Strategic study is still irreplaceable and cannot be underestimated even in the time of popular anti-military fashion and active international cooperation. In this regard, as a foundation of national defense, deterrence and defense deserve to be further studied.

並列關鍵字

Strategic study ； Deterrence