透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.19.255.50
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

Timor-Leste a Relapsing "Success" Story

並列摘要


Between the beginning of the external intervention in Timor-Leste in September 1999 and the national crisis of 2006, the country was considered one of the most successful cases of external promotion of democracy and nation-state building. The conditions were about as ideal as they could be: there had been a general consensus over the future between external and internal actors, an almost complete lack of spoilers, and a high degree of international interest. Nonetheless, the result to date has been an imperfect democracy, illustrated by a lack of socio-economic progress, a politicization of the security forces, corruption, and a poorly functioning judiciary. While some have blamed external actors for imposing their ”kingdom” in Timor-Leste and others see the main problems in the East Timorese political culture, this essay will argue that the situation is a more complex mix of internal and external factors. Building a democratic nation-state is a challenging exercise, even given the most ideal of circumstances.

參考文獻


United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)(2006).Timor-Leste National Human Development Report 2006.(Timor-Leste National Human Development Report 2006).,::UNDP.
Economist Intelligence Unit(2007).Index of Democracy 2006.London:Economist Intelligence Unit.
Judith Bovensiepen,Andre Borgerhoff(ed.),Manuel Schmitz,Focus Asien(2008).Osttimor am Scheideweg: Chaos oder Neuanfang.Essen, Germany:Asienhaus.
Tanja Hohe(2002).Totem Polls: Indigenous Concepts and 'Free and Fair Elections' in East Timor.International Peacekeeping.9(4),76-78.
International Crisis Group (ICG)(2009).Timor-Leste: No Time for Complacency, Asia Briefing No. 87.

延伸閱讀