透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.14.200.246
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

士紳化以外:臺北大稻埕的文化經濟與舊城襲產再/創造

Beyond Gentrification: Cultural Economy and Heritage (Re-)Making in the Historic District of Twatutia in Taipei

摘要


在東北亞與東南亞,歷史城區的文化導向式都市再生,常被批評:進入歷史城區的新興文化產業與當地歷史文化關係不大,並造成歷史城區的士紳化,迫遷原有傳統產業。本文以臺北大稻埕為例,對東亞文化導向式都市再生之中,文化經濟與舊城襲產關係,提出更細緻的理解。本文借用「文化永續」的概念,認為當地行動者的抱負及讓該抱負得以實踐的環境是關鍵,並指出:進入歷史城區經營的新興文化經濟體,可以透過連結在地元素開發新產品,或文化創意介入等方式,參與既有襲產的保存、復興與再創造,並在既有歷史文化基礎之上,創造出新的襲產,實現文化永續的可能;同時,歷史城區的傳統文化和襲產亦並非被動地受影響,而可以主動連結文化經濟和挪用相關論述,再造傳統,並提供平臺,支持當地文化藝術有機地演變、發展與蛻變。同時,本文指出,士紳化理論不一定能準確形容經歷文化導向式都市再生的歷史城區,亦無法涵蓋現在歷史城區遇到的困境,包括:隨著人流而來的攤販,將導致觀光同質化等問題。

並列摘要


In East and Southeast Asia, culture-led urban regeneration has been criticized for bringing in cultural economy activities that have few connections, if at all, with the local contexts, and leading to gentrification of the historic districts and eviction of traditional businesses. By positioning the transformation of Twatutia (Dadaocheng ) in Taipei in culture-led urban regeneration in East and Southeast Asia, this paper proposes a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between cultural economy and cultural heritage in historic districts. By developing the concept of "cultural sustainability', I argue that the local actors' aspirations and the environments that allow the realization of their aspirations are key factors. With such actors and environment, the emerging cultural economy is able to create new cultural products by embedding local elements, and preserve, regenerate, and remake local cultural heritage through creative intervention. Emerging cultural economy can make new heritage by engaging with existing local traditions. Cultural sustainability can thus be achieved. Besides, preservers of traditional cultures and cultural heritage in historic districts can also actively engage with the discourses and practices of cultural economy to remake the local traditions. They can also provide a platform for the evolution, development, and transformation of local cultural and art scenes. This paper also argues that "gentrification" is not necessarily a useful theoretical intervention towards historic districts which underwent culture-led urban regeneration because they encounter problems beyond the notion of "gentrification", including the influx of vendors that will lead to the homogenization of tourist experience.

參考文獻


邱淑宜、林文一(Chiu, Shu-yi and Lin, Wen-I) 。2019。〈臺北市西門紅樓創意街區的真實性修補及其治理〉“Taibeishi ximen honglou chuangyi jiequ de zhenshixing xiubu jiqi zhili” [Authenticity Fix and its Governance of the Ximen Red House Neighbourhood, Taipei City],《都市與計劃》Dushi yu jihua [City and Planning] 46(1): 1-31。
夏鑄九、趙慧琳(Hsia, Chu-joe, and Chao, Hui-Lin)。2015。〈漲薪之後的剝奪與排除:富士康工人的都市狀況〉“Zhangxin zhihou de boduo yu paichu: fFushikang gongren de dushi zhuangkuang”[Exploitation and Exclusion: Foxconn Workers’ Urban Condition Following Wage Hike] 。《建築與城鄉研究學報》Jianzhu yu chengxiang yanjiu xuebao [Journal of Building and Planning] 21: 93-117。
殷寶寧(Yin, Pao-Ning)。2016。〈創意街區、飲食文化與都市再生:臺北市大稻埕迪化街美食地景與文創轉向〉“Chuangyi jiequ, yinshi wenhua yu dushi zaisheng: taibei shi dadaocheng dihuajie meishi dijing yu wenchuang zhuanxiang”[Creative blocks, gastronomy and urban regeneration: the Formation of Landscape of Gastronomy and Cultural Creative Industries in Dadaocheng in Taipei City],《文資學報》Wenzi xuebao [Journal of Culture Resources] 10: 29-66。
殷寶寧(Yin, Pao-Ning)。(Yin, Pao-Ning)。2018。〈後博物館、街區活化與老屋再生:臺北市大稻埕街區個案研究〉“Hou bowuguan, jiequ huohua yu laowu zaisheng: taibei shi dadaocheng jiequ gean yanjiu” [Post-museum, Revitalization of Neighborhood and the Adaptive Reuse of Old Buildings: A Case Study of Dadaocheng Area in Taipei City],《現代美術學報》Xiandai meishu xuebao[Journal of Taipei Fine Arts Museum] 36: 25-56。
殷寶寧(Yin, Pao-Ning)。(Yin, Pao-Ning)。2019。〈從藝術介入、創意市集到社區記憶再現:大稻埕都市再生的後博物館想像〉“Cong yishu jieru, chuangyi shiji dao shequ jiyi zaixian: dadaocheng dushi zaisheng de hou bowuguan xiangxiang”"[Art Intervention, Creative Market and Representations of Community Memories: Post-Museum Imagination of the Regeneration of Dadaocheng, Taipei],《博物館學季刊》Bowuguan xue jikan [Museology Quarterly] 33(2): 29-47。

延伸閱讀