緒論:身體素養除了重視運動技能與知識外,也強調學習者的動機、與他人溝通互動的能力,提高學生的身體素養有助於培養其運動能力與規律運動習慣。此外,教師打造一個支持性的環境,也對學習大有益處。本研究目的在於,將SAAFE原則(支持、活躍、自主、公平、享受)及團隊建立策略介入於籃球課程,主要分析團隊建立策略對大學生運球技能學習成效、身體素養及團隊合作之影響。方法:本研究採用準實驗設計,對象為選修籃球課程之大學生,一班為實驗組共42人,一班為對照組共34人。兩組的籃球課程皆以SAAFE原則設計,實驗組進行10週團隊建立策略介入,同時,對照組為傳統教學法。結果:經成對樣本t檢定分析,實驗組在身體素養、團隊合作後測優於前測,對照組則無。但經單因子共變數檢定,兩組無顯著差異。結論:此課程模式對於大學生的身體素養及團隊合作具有正向影響,團隊溝通與回饋、領導及心理契約可能在其中發揮作用,然而,可能需要更長的介入時間來驗證效果。
Introduction: Physical literacy not only emphasizes motor skills and knowledge, but also focus on learners' motivation and ability for communication and interaction. Improving physical literacy contributes to develop students' sports abilities and make exercise a regular habit. Moreover, instructors create a supportive environment that also benefits learning. This study aims to the application of SAAFE principles (supportive, active, autonomous, fair, enjoyable) and team building strategy to basketball classes, and explores the effects of team building strategy intervention on students' dribbling learning, physical literacy and teamwork competency. Methods: We use a quasi-experimental design, targeting at college students enrolled in basketball courses. It is expected that a total of 42 students in one class will be assigned as the experimental group and a total of 34 students in one classes will be assigned as the control group. These three basketball classes are designed based on SAAFE principles. The team building intervention will be given to experimental group once a week for 10 weeks in first semester. Instead, the traditional teaching method will be applied to control group. Results: The results of paired sample t test show that experimental group has significant improvement on physical literacy and teamwork competency, but control group doesn't have the same effect. However, the significant difference between two groups doesn't exist after one-way ANCOVA testing. Conclusion: This course model has a positive effect on students' physical literacy and teamwork competency which may due to a role played by team communication and feedback, leadership, and psychological contract. Nevertheless, a longer intervention time is needed to verify the effect of team building.