透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.48.106
  • 期刊

布魯樂谷與八仙海岸主題遊樂園體驗價值之研究

A Study of Consumers' Experiential Value in Blue Lagoon and Formosa Fun Coast Theme Parks

摘要


本研究之目的以Mathwick, Malhotra and Rigdon (2001)體驗價值包括之投資報酬(consumer return on investment)、服務優越性(service excellence)、美感(aesthetics)與趣味性(playfulness)之因素,探討布魯樂谷與八仙海岸之消費者體驗價值之情況。運用因素分析、獨立樣本t檢定、多變量分析與相關分析進行回收問卷資料統計分析。結果顯示布魯樂谷與八仙海岸之消費者所佔比率差不多,其中男性、未婚、21至30歲、大專院校、月收入20,001-40,000元之消費者居多數。類別、性別、婚姻在體驗價值均有顯著之差異,年齡、學歷、月收入與地區在體驗價值均有顯著之交互作用。體驗價值因素之相關分析均達顯著水準,以「投資報酬」與「趣味性」、「投資報酬」與「服務優越性」的關係最密切。建議布魯樂谷與八仙海岸主題遊樂園加強遊戲趣味化與服務的特色,強化消費者之體驗價值,加深消費者對園區設施與服務的印象與認同,吸引消費者再次前來布魯樂谷與八仙海岸主題遊樂園。

並列摘要


Based on the experiential values theories of Mathwick, Malhotra and Rigdon (2001), including consumer return on investment, service excellence, aesthetics and playfulness, the purpose of this study was to discuss their experiential values after consumers visited Blue Lagoon and Formosa Fun Coast Theme Park. Analysis methods, such as factor analysis, t-test, MANOVA and correlation analysis were operated to analyze collected data through questionnaire. The results indicated that consumers visiting these two parks were at the same percentage. The majority of consumers was male, single, at the age of 21 to 30, had college education, and earned $20,001-$40,000 per month. Blue Lagoon or Formosa Fun Coast theme park, gender and marital status had significant differences in factors of experiential values. Age, education background, monthly income and resident location had significant interactions with experiential values. The outcomes in correlation analysis were shown significant difference, of which ”consumer return on investment” had the closest relationship with ”playfulness” and ”service excellence”. It is suggested that Blue Lagoon and Formosa Fun Coast Theme Park strengthen distinguish service and amusing facilities in order to enforce consumers' experiential values, deepen consumers' impression, win consumers' recognition of the theme park and importantly, draw consumers back to visit Blue Lagoon and Formosa Fun Coast Theme Park again.

參考文獻


王世澤(2003)。體驗行銷:模型發展與實務驗證。國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
王伯文(2004)。民宿體驗、旅遊意象、遊客滿意度與忠誠度影響關係之研究-以奮起湖地區爲例。嘉義:南華大學旅遊事業管理學研究所。
李世昌(2005)。主題遊樂園從業人員運動休閒行爲模式之研究。台北:高立。
李淑任(2005)。咖啡館之休閒體驗與顧客參與之探討-以台中縣市咖啡館爲例。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系。
林秀貞(2004)。體驗行銷與顧客忠誠度之關係探討。東吳大學企業管理學系。

被引用紀錄


張瑞庭(2015)。文化創意產業體驗活動型式之心流體驗、體驗價值及行為意圖之研究〔碩士論文,國立虎尾科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6827/NFU.2015.00137
廖怡綺(2009)。WiMAX行動觀光服務使用意向之研究〔碩士論文,大同大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0081-3001201315104776
尤智隆(2010)。自行車環島活動之體驗價值分析〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-0601201112112566
利文良(2016)。觀光吸引力、體驗價值與重遊意願之研究:以屏東縣三地門鄉山川琉璃吊橋為例〔碩士論文,義守大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0074-2307201611172400

延伸閱讀