《洛陽伽藍記》收錄〈庭山賦〉之動機再探

Exploring the Motive of ＂Luoyang Qielan Ji＂ in Citing ＂Ting Shan Fu＂

林郁迢(Yu-Tiao Lin)

《臺北大學中文學報》 17期 (2015/03) Pp. 37-52

摘要

姜質〈庭山賦〉既非名家名作，甚至文辭粗鄙，卻被文學造詣頗高的楊衒之全文引錄於《洛陽伽藍記》，此弔詭現象不僅引發近代學者多所臆測，也誘使本文商量舊學之興趣，進而探究楊氏之所以引錄與其信念價值判若雲泥的〈庭山賦〉，實乃史家一筆兩寫之敘述策略，藉此諷刺擾亂綱紀的權臣及阿附權貴的逢迎小人。就楊氏撰書之時間點而言，當時氣焰囂張、無視禮法綱系己的高歡父子及阿諛順旨、奉詔撰史的魏收，恰符合此兩類形象。

關鍵字

楊衒之 ； 洛陽伽藍記 ； 姜質 ； 庭山賦 ； 高歡 ； 魏收

並列摘要

Composed by a little-known writer Jiang Zhi, ＂Ting Shan Fu＂ presents a poor language and rough rhetoric skills. However, such work was full-text cited in ＂Luoyang Qielan Ji＂ by Yang Xuanzhi, who achieved high literary performance. This paradoxical phenomenon has triggered considerable assumptions among scholars in recent years and elicited the motivation of this study in discussing the old learning. This study explored Yang's motive for citing ＂Ting Shan Fu＂, which presents content contradictory to Yang's belief and value, and determined that such citation was a historian descriptive strategy of implying double meanings in a passage to ironize the officers who held power but breached legal principles and low-dignity people who were obedient to authorities. Considering the time when Yang composed ＂Luoyang Qielan Ji＂, the arrogant Gao Huan family who despises legal principles and Wei Shou who edited history by conforming to the emperor's order exactly met the characteristics of breaching legal principles and low dignity.

並列關鍵字

Yang Xuanzhi ； ＂Luoyang Qielan Ji＂ ； Jiang Zhi ； ＂Ting Shan Fu＂ ； Gao Huan ； WeiShou

參考文獻

王利器(1983)。顏氏家訓集解。臺北:漢京文化公司。

司馬光(1973)。資治通鑑。臺北:明倫出版社。

李百藥(1998)。北齊書。臺北:鼎文書局。

范祥雍(2006)。洛陽伽藍記校注。上海:上海古籍出版社。

周祖謨(2004)。洛陽伽藍記校釋。上海:上海書店出版社。