Have library access?
IP:100.28.227.63
  • Journals
  • OpenAccess

Types and Functions of If-conditionals in Lecture Introductions

Abstracts


This study examined the types and functions of if-conditionals in lecture introductions. The data comprise 144 if-conditionals from a 37,373-word corpus (3.85 per 1000 words). A majority of if-conditionals are direct conditionals (89.6%), with 10.4% of indirect conditionals. Of the direct conditionals, 72.9% are expressed as open condition and 16.7% as hypothetical condition. Hypothetical if-conditionals are mainly for hedging about the students' knowledge, and less frequently for hedging about the lecturer's own knowledge, hedging the intended interpretation of the utterance, expressing politeness, or making indirect requests. Most of the if-conditional clauses are in an initial position (88.9%), with some in medial (1.4%) and end (9.7%) positions. Initial if-conditional clauses mainly serve as a framework for subsequent propositions by presenting assumptions, but are minimally used for contrasting, exemplification, and exploring options. Medial if-conditional clauses function as a qualifier. End if-conditional clauses are used to remind students of a prior statement. The study shows that if-conditionals have an important information-linking function, and the functions of if-conditionals are linked to the positioning of if-clauses.

References


Athanasiadou, A., & Dirven, R. (1997). On conditionals again. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.143
Biber, D. (2001). On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multi-dimensional analysis. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 215-240). London: Longman. 10.1080/01638539209544806
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes. V. (2004a). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405. 10.1093/applin/25.3.371
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Clark, V., Cortes, V., Csomay, E., & Urzua, (2004b). Representing language use in the university: Analysis of the TOEFFL 2000 spoken and written academic language corpus. Test of English as a Foreign Language. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service. 10.2307/414678
Csomay, E. (2013). Lexical bundles in discourse structure: A corpus-based study of classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 369-388. 10.1093/applin/ams045

Read-around