- 期刊
洪深翻譯《瓊斯皇》之始末探析－兼論洪深《趙閻王》與洪譯《瓊斯皇》之聯繫
The Process of the Translation of ＂The Emperor Jones＂ by Hong Shen: And on the Relationship between Hong Shen's ＂Yama Zhao＂ and his Translation for ＂The Emperor Jones＂
摘要
洪深熱衷於改譯外國戲劇作品，將外國的戲劇中國化。但對於影響他創作美國劇作家尤金．奧尼爾的作品，他卻沒有改譯。因為洪深創作的劇本《趙閻王》在劇情結構方面明顯地借鑒了尤金．奧尼爾的《瓊斯皇》，而《趙閻王》的純中國背景以及它與《瓊斯皇》劇情上的頗多相似，限制了將《瓊斯皇》中國化，改譯《瓊斯皇》無異於重作《趙閻王》。甚至基於個人名聲的考慮，他在彼時甚少向公眾提及奧尼爾。然而1930年代不同的文化背景、政治背景以及洪深的個人經歷又促使他翻譯了奧尼爾的《瓊斯皇》。但由於洪深與奧尼爾在藝術追求方面的不同，導致他對奧尼爾及其《瓊斯皇》的翻譯做有意的疏離和必然的誤讀。他對《瓊斯皇》中的鼓聲的誤譯和漏譯，抹殺了作品中的表現主義特色。
並列摘要
Hong Shen keens to rearrange foreign plays, then adapted them to Chinese audience. But he didn't translate American dramatist Eugene O'Neill's work what impact on his own creation. Since that Hong's script ＂Yama Zhao＂ clearly referenced O'Neill's ＂The Emperor Jones＂ in terms of plot structure. The pure Chinese background in ＂Yama Zhao＂, and the similar story to ＂The Emperor Jones＂, hindered that translate it into Chinese characteristic, which means to rewrite ＂Yama Zhao＂. Based on the consideration of his personal reputation, Hong even rarely mentioned O'Neill in public at that time. However, the different cultural and political backgrounds and Hong's individual experiences led him to introduce and translate O'Neill and ＂The Emperor Jones＂ in 1930s. The dissimilar artistic viewpoints between the two dramatists, induced Hong's intentional alienation and inevitable misunderstanding to O'Neill. These mistranslation and omissions of the drum sound in his translation, denied the expressionist feature in this O'Neill's masterpiece definitely.