透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.73.112
  • 期刊

色情作品認定標準的再思

Rethinking the Criteria for Identifying Pornographic Works

摘要


臺灣色情作品的認定標準有停滯不前的問題,在定義上總是莫衷一是,因此參考美國聯邦最高法院在淫穢色情認定標準上的歷史和變遷,與臺灣色情作品認定標準相互印證,發現目前國內對於猥褻出版品的定義仍有未明,將色情內容區分為「硬蕊」和「軟蕊」也欠缺正當性。因此,建議未來考已考慮跳脫定義上的問題,統一將猥褻看做或改為一項中立的概念,之後秉持著實證研究的精神,效仿德國直接明文禁止含有特定場景的色情作品散布或公然陳列的方式,根據不同類別對於性自主和青少年身心健全發展的實質影響,採取列舉的方式來對特定色情作品加以限制,才能夠停止在定義的問題上打轉。

關鍵字

色情作品 認定標準 淫穢

並列摘要


Taiwan's standards for identifying pornographic works are stagnant, and there is always disagreement on the definition. Therefore, referring to the history and changes of the U.S. Supreme Court's standards for identifying pornographic works, and corroborating with Taiwan's standards for identifying pornographic works, we found that the current domestic standards for identifying pornographic works are inconsistent. The definition of obscene publications is still unclear, and the distinction between pornographic content as "hardcore" and "softcore" lacks legitimacy. Therefore, it is suggested that in the future, we should consider getting rid of definitional issues and uniformly treat obscenity as a neutral concept or change it to a neutral concept. Then, in the spirit of empirical research, we can follow the example of Germany and directly prohibit the distribution or publicity of pornographic works containing specific scenes. Only by enumerating restrictions on specific pornographic works based on the substantive impact of different categories on sexual autonomy and the sound development of young people's physical and mental health can we stop dwelling on definitional issues.

延伸閱讀