綜論范甯關於經學的評議

本文針對范甯關於經學的三則代表性評說，進行較完整的探討，希望能對其經學特色及相關問題有更深入的了解。范甯對王弼、何晏的撻伐，有些前有所承。後人反對其說者，或認為《三國志》所載何、王事蹟不無誣辭；或以范氏本身信佛，則其譏評不免為門戶成見等，都有不妥之處。范甯對三傳的糾責，部分亦前有所承，他對三傳的批評未必合理，卻反應了其兼采三傳，不主一家的學風。范甯叉認為《穀梁》舊注皆膚淺無可觀，且雜引《左氏》、《公羊》為說，對各家舊注取擇甚少。范甯對當時重要注本麋信《穀梁注》的說法，似未能清楚注明、嚴謹引用，亦不能不視為范《注》的缺失之一。若從一更大的學術傳統來看，則范甯及其所批評的王弼、何晏、《穀梁》舊注諸家，皆是沿東漢古學風氣，擺脫家法的約束，這是魏晉經學的重要特色。

關鍵字

范甯；王弼；何晏；三傳；麋信

並列摘要

In this paper, Fan Ning's three representative comment on Confucian classics, a more complete discussion through this Analysis , hope its a better understanding of the learning characteristics and related issues. Fan Ning Wang Bi, He Yan, lambasting some before some bearing. Future generations objection, or that contained in Three Kingdoms, deeds not framed speech; Fan himself a Buddhist, satire inevitably portal prejudices, there are inadequacies. Fan Ning three pass the correct responsibility, part of the former has been bearing the criticism of his three pass may not be reasonable, but reflects its adopted both pass, the main one style of study. Fan Ning also think Guliangzhuan old notes are superficial and non-substantial, and miscellaneous lead Zuozhuan, Gongyangzhuan for the select little take on various old note. Fan Ning was important to note the the Mi Xin Guliangzhuan, saying, it seems unable to clearly indicate the precise reference, also can not but be regarded as one of the Fan's Note the lack of view from a larger academic tradition, then Fan Ning its criticism of Wang Bi, He Yan, Guliangzhuan old note various all along the Eastern Han dynasty of ancient ethos, get rid of the constraints of family laws, which is the Confucian classics The important feature.