超越之形態－從托名狄奧尼修斯重估牟宗三的超越觀念

牟宗三用「外在超越」與「內在超越」判分基督教和儒家，引起了廣泛和持久的討論。不過，目前學界的討論主要集中在現代哲學或者作為整體的基督宗教傳統，而本文希望透過古代教父的視角，主要以托名狄奧尼修斯的超越觀作為個例來對牟宗三的內在超越觀念進行重估。本文首先通過牟氏超越觀的考察，引出其背後的預設和關切；其次從托名狄奧尼修斯的思想來引出本體－邏輯和宗教兩個維度的超越；最後本文認為牟氏和托名狄奧尼修斯在超越概念上存在不少相似性，而他們的差異則揭示出超越者作為位格還是理性的兩種不同形態。

Keywords

超越；內在超越；托名狄奧尼修斯；牟宗三；儒耶對話

Parallel abstracts

MOU Zongsan's use of "external transcendence" and "immanent transcendence" to differentiate Christianity and Confucianism has stirred long-lasting debates. Although most of the related discussions center on modern philosophy or Christian tradition as a whole, it is the aim of this article to reevaluate MOU's concept of transcendence through the perspective of Pseudo-Dionysius. This article first reviews MOU's idea of transcendence, revealing his hidden agenda and concern behind this concept; then it traces the notion of transcendence in the corpus of Pseudo-Dionysius, making a distinction between ontological-epistemological transcendence and religious transcendence in Dionysius's thought; finally it concludes that actually there are many similarities between MOU and Dionysius, while their differences actually manifest in two forms of the immanent transcendence-as person or as rationality.

Parallel keywords

Transcendence ； Immanent Transcendence ； Pseudo-Dionysius ； MOU Zongsan ； Confucian-Christian Dialogue

Read-around

Download

Read this ↓