- 期刊
美「中」太平洋競逐現況研析
Situation of U.S.A.-Mainland China Pacific Rivalry
摘要
一、「後冷戰」時期，美國將與太平洋島國間的雙邊關係「外包」給澳、紐兩國處理，直到近年中共在地區影響力逐漸擴大後，拜登政府才又重新關注，並將「太平洋戰略」提升為獨立位階，成為「印太戰略」項下重要構成部分；而中共則自1990年起，每年均派員參與該地區定期舉辦的「論壇」（2000年起更名為「太平洋島國論壇」），2018年至2020年間，更先後與10個地區國簽署「一帶一路」協議，關係急速深化。二、2022年4月，中共與索羅門簽署《軍事安全合作協議》，且試圖將這種合作模式，複製到與其他太平洋島國間的關係；這份協議之所以備受關注，係因諸如派遣軍隊協助鎮壓動亂、在他國駐軍等條款，通常被認為是不平等條約中才會出現的內容。三、2019年索羅門、吉里巴斯與我國先後斷交並與中共建交，使得我國目前在太平洋的邦交國中僅剩4國；然而在以美國為首的西方國家意識到問題的嚴重性，積極擴大對此區域事務的參與力度後，「骨牌式斷交」的情形，短期內應不致再度發生，後續發展仍值關注。
並列摘要
1.During the "Post-Cold War" period, the United States outsourced its bilateral relations with Pacific islands to New Zealand and Australia. It was not until CCP's influence in the Pacific gradually expanded in recent years that it refocused on this region. After the Biden administration took office, it raised the "Pacific Strategy" to an independent level and became an important part of the "Indo-Pacific Strategy". Since 1990, CCP has sent personnel to participate in the "South Pacific Forum" (renamed "Pacific Island Forum" in 2000) regularly held by Pacific islands. From 2018 to 2020, CCP successively signed the "Belt and Road" agreement with 10 Pacific islands which deepened the bilateral relationship rapidly. 2.In April 2022, CCP and Solomon signed the "Military Security Cooperation Agreement", and tried to replicate the model to its relations with other Pacific islands. The reason why this agreement has attracted much attention is that clauses such as sending troops to help suppress turmoil and stationing troops in other countries are usually considered to be the content of unequal treaties. 3.In 2019, Solomon and Kiribati broke off diplomatic relations with ROC and established diplomatic relations with CCP, leaving ROC with only four diplomatic allies in the Pacific area. However, Western countries headed by the United States realized the seriousness of the problem and pay attention to Pacific affairs. After participating in the strength, the situation of "domino break" should not happen in the short term.