透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.225
  • 期刊

Case Analysis of Dispute between Baoneng and Vanke‐Based on Anti‐takeover Perspective

摘要


This article analyzes Vanke's performance characteristics, equity characteristics to explain why Vanke was the target. Also this article performs the analysis of the motivation of Vanke's anti‐acquisition, Vanke's public opinion strategy, suspension strategy, knight knight, and legal proceedings. Second, this case has taken typical antitakeover measures, but it has not played a good turnaround, which reflects the status of anti‐acquisition of listed companies in China's capital market. Finally, in order to solve these problems, it puts forward a feasible strategic proposal for other listed companies to anti‐takeover under the current legal framework.

參考文獻


Johnson W C, Karpoff J M, Yi S. The bonding hypothesis of takeover defenses: Evidence from IPO firm[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2015,117(2):307-332.
Li Wei-an, QI Lu-jun, Li Yuan-zhen.Interpretation of "Leveraged Buyout" from the Governance enlightenment of "Baowan Dispute" [J]. Tsinghua Financial Review,2017(01):34-37.
S.Thomas J.Chemmanur,Inmates Paellas,Karen Simony.An Management Qulity and Anti-Takeover Provisions[J].Journal of Law and Economics Forthcoming,2008,42(2):58-76.
Li Qianshu. Application and Development of Golden Parachutes in Chinese Enterprises -- Based on the Background of "Baowan Dispute" [J].China Business Theory,2018(07):86-87.
Sundaramurthy C,Mahoney J.M., Mahoney J.T..Board Structure Anti-takeover Provisions Strategic[J].Management Journal,1996(17):377-394.

延伸閱讀