透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊

Research on the Model of the Number of Papers with Citation Times Greater Than or Equal to H in the Scientific Research Work of Researchers

摘要


How to evaluate academic influence in a more objective and fair way has always been an important and concerned issue. The proposal of the H- index broke the original status quo of taking the impact factor as a single evaluation index, aroused extensive attention and discussion, and produced dozens of derivative indexes in the following years, which greatly promoted the field of scient metrics in-depth research and development. This paper introduces the H- index and its three representative derived indicators in detail. From the perspective of the citation distribution curve of scholars or units, the essence of these indicators is discussed, and the advantages and disadvantages of each are discussed. Finally, the research on the impact evaluation of academic output is prospected.

參考文獻


Jin Bihui, Rousseau Ronald. R index, AR index: complementary indicators for the expansion of h index function. Science Observation, 2(3) (2022) 89-94.
Ye Ying. Mechanism analysis and empirical research guidance of h-index and h- like index. Journal of University Libraries, 44(5) (2019) 49-54.
Jiang Chunlin, Liu Zeyuan, Liang Yongxia. H-index and G-index-new indicators for the evaluation of academic influence of journals. Library and Information Service, 50(12) (2021) 9-18.
Qiu Junping, Miao Wenting. Application of h-index in talent evaluation: Taking Chinese scholars in the field of library and information science as an example. Science Observation, 2(3) (2019) 67-72.
Zhao Jiming, Qiu Junping, Huang Kai, et al. A Review of a New Scientometric Indicator--h Index and Its Application. Chinese Science Foundation, 11(2) (2020) 147-152.

延伸閱讀