混合威脅不容易說清楚,但似乎又是真實存在的,有些時候似乎又呈現出政治作戰之外貌。處理威脅,不能僅從表象上之現況著手,而必須及於整個安全層面之檢討。安全在本質上是被動的,要能夠具有主動性,就必須有情報來支撐。而情報的學理與實踐在「九.一一事件」後就已進行大幅改革,其目的就在於對不斷演化、不易掌握的威脅及有敵意行為者的多樣組合進行有效的回應。相對於臺灣之情報圈,合併了反情報之情報工作並不完整,想要處理混合威脅之軍事情報工作必須有新的思維、目標與工作對象。更重要的是,作為政治作戰領域一環之情報戰,必須補強反情報之內涵,才能完善軍事情報工作。
Hybrid threats are not easy to clarify, but they seem to be real, and sometimes they appear to be political warfare. Dealing with threats must not only start from the present situation on the surface, but must go to the review of the entire security level. Security is passive in nature. To be proactive, it must be supported by intelligence. The theory and practice of intelligence have undergone substantial reforms after the "September 11 Incident", with the purpose of effectively responding to the constantly evolving threats that are difficult to grasp and the diverse combinations of hostile actors. Compared with Taiwan's intelligence community, intelligence work that incorporates counterintelligence is not complete. Future military intelligence work that wants to deal with hybrid threats must have new thinking, targets, and work object. More importantly, as an intelligence warfare in the field of political warfare, the connotation of counterintelligence must be strengthened in order to improve military intelligence affairs.