從查證人之程序地位談查證人偽證及洩密罪──以智慧財產案件審理法第74條為中心

Starting with the Procedural Status of Investigator to Discuss the Crime of Perjury and Leakage of Investigator --- Focusing on Article 74 of Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act

陳靜隆(Ching-Lung Chin)

《真理法學論叢》 25期 (2024/06) Pp. 85-108

摘要

本文從查證人之程序地位，探究智慧財產案件審理法第74條查證人偽證及洩密之規範。基於落實層級化保護體系及周延維護查證所獲悉秘密之觀點，認為查證人保密義務之範圍，不應僅限定於查證所知悉之「營業秘密」。另有關查證人之偽證罪，在既有學說及判解上，對於刑法偽證罪之闡釋，應足供參酌。

關鍵字

查證人 ； 偽證罪 ； 保密義務 ； 程序地位 ； 拒絕證言權

並列摘要

This article explores the norms for perjury and leakage of Investigator in Article 74 of Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act from the procedural status of Investigator. Based on the perspective of "implementing a hierarchical protection system" and "comprehensive maintenance of secrets learned during verification", the scope of the investigator's confidentiality obligations should not be limited to the "trade secrets" learned during verification. In addition, regarding the perjury committed by investigators, we can refer to the existing theories and precedents for perjury in criminal law.

並列關鍵字

investigator ； perjury ； confidentiality obligations ； procedural status ； right to refuse testimony