浅析“圣母始胎无染原罪”信理之意义

在12世纪之前，圣母始胎无染原罪这一信理没有被明确地认信过，《圣经》中也没有直接，明确和严格的证据用来证明此一信理的正确性。但是有人主张此一信理被隐秘地包含在教父们的教导中。在第十二及十三世纪里，此一问题曾引起极大的争议。当时知名的神学家，包括托马斯．阿奎那在内，对“圣母始胎无染原罪”多持保留态度。

關鍵字

圣母；始胎无染原罪；《圣经》；托马斯．阿奎那

並列摘要

Before the 12th century, the dogma of "the Immaculate Conception of Virgin Mary" was not explicitly confirmed, and there was no direct, clear, and rigorous evidence in the Bible to prove the validity of this doctrine. But it has been argued that this doctrine is secretly contained in the teachings of the church Fathers. In the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, this issue was extremely controversial. Well-known theologians of that time, including Thomas Aquinas, held reservations about " Immaculate Conception of Virgin Mary".

並列關鍵字

Virgin Mary ； Immaculate Conception of Virgin Mary ； Bible ； Thomas Aquinas

參考文獻

Brian Daley, "Gregory of Nazianzus", The Early Christian Church Fathers, New York, 2006.

Google Scholar

Brian Reynolds, Gateway to Heaven: Marian Doctrine and Devotion Image and Typology in the Patristic and Medieval Periods, vol. 1, NY: New City Press, 2012.