屈原外交主張之研究

A Study on Qu Yuan's Diplomatic Propositions

洪秀菊(Hsiu-Chu Hong)

《科際整合月刊》 9卷6期 (2024/06) Pp. 13-23

摘要

本文以文獻研究法，探討屈原外交主張「和齊抗秦」，時間從西元前311年張儀出使到楚國，游說「秦楚和好」、西元前305年秦楚聯姻、西元前304年秦楚會盟、西元前299年秦楚會盟、至西元前293年秦楚會盟，屈原反對，被流放南方的荒僻地區。為何屈原「和齊抗秦」失敗，而楚懷王、楚頃襄王「秦楚聯姻」也未能保住楚國免被秦國滅亡的命運？研究發現：秦國有兼併各國之野心，任何對秦國示好之政策都會失敗；唯一可靠的政策，是各國團結，共同抵禦秦國的侵略。可是，各國短視，只想拉攏秦國，以求自保；被秦國各個擊破。

關鍵字

屈原 ； 外交決策 ； 楚懷王 ； 楚頃襄王 ； 作用者 ； 複雜性理論

並列摘要

This article uses the literature research method to explore Qu Yuan's diplomatic advocacy of "harmony with Qi and resistance to Qin", starting from Zhang Yi's mission to Chu in 311 BC to lobby for "reconciliation between Qin and Chu", the marriage between Qin and Chu in 305 BC, and 304 BC The Qin-Chu Alliance, the Qin-Chu Alliance in 299 BC, and the Qin-Chu Alliance in 293 BC, Qu Yuan opposed and was exiled to a remote area in the south. Why did Qu Yuan's "alchemy with Qi against Qin" fail, and the "Qin-Chu marriage" between King Huai of Chu and King Qingxiang of Chu also failed to save Chu from being destroyed by Qin? The study found that Qin had the ambition to annex other countries, and any policy that showed favor to Qin would fail; the only reliable policy was for all countries to unite and jointly resist Qin's aggression. However, all countries were short-sighted and only wanted to win over Qin in order to protect themselves, but they were defeated by Qin one by one.

並列關鍵字

Qu Yuan ； diplomatic decision-making ； King Huai of Chu ； King Qingxiang of Chu ； agents ； complexity theory