- 期刊
- OpenAccess
伊藤仁齋《論語古義》與朱熹《論語集注》解經方法之比較
The Analysis of Itō Jinsai's hermeneutic method of the Rongo Kogi
摘要
本文考較江戶伊藤仁齋《論語古義》與朱熹《論語集注》解經方法之異同；歸納提出：「音讀」、「訓詁」、「文義」、「解說」、「意見」五層解經體式，作為比較對照之基礎與模組。分層析次對照之後，《古義》與《集注》在「訓詁」、「文義」二層注解，多有雷同，此由兩者所據原典相同之故。朱熹典據《注疏》以通訓詁，仁齋《古義》出入漢、唐注疏者亦多，彼此經解之歧異，表現在「解說」、「意見」二重詮釋之相左。朱熹、仁齋解經皆重博覽諸說，抉擇裁定，斷以己意。然朱熹詮釋經典著重「發其精微」，而仁齋解經之說，不以議論淺顯為病，著重「古義」之保守。此外，仁齋注解《論語》頗為徵引南宋時賢張栻、考亭後學輔廣等說；經考察，《古義》當是參酌取材《論語大全》編纂成書，就此觀點而言：仁齋其學為晚明學術之餘緒，《論語古義》可視為明代講章之流裔。
並列摘要
In this paper, the "notes between sentences", "notes between paragraphs" and "detailed explanation" written by Itō Jinsai in Edo period which commented on the exegesis method of Classical Connotation of Analects(Rongo Kogi)and Zhu Xi's quintuplicate exegesis method for the "phonetic reading", "exegesis", "literary context", "variorum" and "comment" of Variorum of Analects(Lun Yu Ji Zhu)in Southern Song Dynasty were examined and compared in an attempt to find out the similarities and difference, the disparity and parity between "Classical Connotation of Analects" and "Variorum of Analects". According to research results, Itō Jinsai's Rongo Kogi was a throwback to Ming Dynasty academe and were scripture handouts with identical nature.