憲法訴訟法施行後地方制度法上之司法救濟面貌

憲法訴訟法實施前，有關地方制度法上聲請司法院解釋之救濟規定，在實踐上多依賴大法官解釋補充其相關之程序要件。然而在函告無效與不予核定之司法救濟上，行政法院卻演繹出一套不受理之邏輯。但是行政訴訟審判權與憲法訴訟審判權之劃分，卻未於大法官解釋中被明確釐清。憲法訴訟法實施之後，憲法訴訟與行政訴訟之比重，似乎有了明顯地位移，行政法院似乎無法再如過往，大幅度地置身事外。面對自治法規與上位階規範衝突之審查，也將會是行政法院馬上需要面對之挑戰。

關鍵字

地方自治監督；函告無效；不予核定；憲法訴訟；行政處分；審判權

並列摘要

Before the Constitutional Court Procedure Act was enforced, the petitions of judicial relief regarding the Local Government Act were in practice relying on the interpretations by the Justices to supplement the relevant procedural requirements. Meanwhile, the Administrative Court has created a logic set of dismissing litigations concerning the central supervisory authority's nullification or dis-approval for the self-government ordinances and regulations. However, the compartmentalization of the jurisdictions of Constitutional Court and Administrative Court was not clearly interpreted by the Justices. After the Constitutional Court Procedure Act was enfoced, the proportion of constitutional and administrative litigations seems to be significantly changed; and it also seems that the Administative Court could no longer, as always, stay out of the disputes between the central and the local governments. To face with the judicial review of the self-government laws for conflicts with the superior laws, also, will be an immediate chanllenge of the Administrative Court.

並列關鍵字

supervision over local self-government ； nullification ； dis-approval ； constitutional litigation ； administrative disposition ； jurisdiction

國際替代計量

憲法訴訟法施行後地方制度法上之司法救濟面貌

全文下載

主題瀏覽