檢視COVID-19疫情下我國的提審實務

我國提審法自2014年基於司法院釋字第708號及第710號解釋意旨，大幅修正施行後，迄今已邁入第7年。而司法實務在這兩年來，也因COVID-19疫情肆虐，人民不服各種隔離檢疫措施而聲請提審，相關的提審案件大幅增加。不過相應於此，法院在提審程序中究竟應如何適用法律，審查事實，以決定人身自由遭剝奪者是否應予釋放，實務卻始終未能提出合理的方案。職是，本文從提審作為落實憲法第8條人身自由保障之不可或缺的制度觀點下，重新解釋提審法上相關條文，藉以評釋國內近來之司法實務，並進而嘗試建構法院面對提審案件時應有的審查模式。

關鍵字

提審；人身自由；合憲性解釋；撤銷訴訟；司法審查模式

並列摘要

In 2014, Taiwan's Habeas Corpus Act went through a thorough revision based on Judicial Yuan Interpretation Nos. 708 and 710. Now, the implement of the amended Act has entered into the seventh year. The cases related to habeas corpus increased significantly since 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to rage around the world; most of the cases were caused by the applications for habeas corpus due to refusals to follow the various preventative measures for COVID-19, such as quarantine. However, the judicial practice has not correspondingly established a reasonable and operable guideline for the courts to examine the facts, to apply the relevant statutes and rules to the applications for habeas corpus, and then decide whether the person deprived of physical freedom should be released. As a result, from the perspective of the Habeas Corpus Act as an indispensable system to implement physical freedom under Article 8 of the Constitution, this article reinterprets the relevant articles under the current Habeas Corpus Act to review and comment on the most recent judicial decisions in Taiwan; then, based on the re-interpretation and reviews, the article proposes an applicable review model for the courts while addressing the applications for habeas corpus that the courts should undertake.

並列關鍵字

habeas corpus ； physical freedom ； interpretation compatible with the constitution ； litigation of revocation ； model of judicial review

國際替代計量

檢視COVID-19疫情下我國的提審實務

全文下載

主題瀏覽