透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.35
  • 學位論文

檢視嘉磷塞除草劑之科技的社會爭議癥結

Examining the Crux of the Scientific, Technological and Social Controversy of Glyphosate-based Herbicides

指導教授 : 周桂田
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究目的是檢視並嘉磷塞除草劑在歐盟、美國與臺灣所引發的科技之社會爭議,採取的治理策略及結果。本文借助風險治理與第三波科學研究的概念,使用資料庫、歷史文獻、訪談、實體與線上會議蒐集資料。本研究發現由於歐盟、美國和臺灣由於治理體制、對基因改造的態度以及在農化產業位置等原因,使得臺灣難以浮現能對嘉磷塞提出強而有力的異議知識網絡。

並列摘要


The objective of this study is to examine and analyze the societal controversies surrounding the use of glyphosate herbicides in the European Union, the United States, and Taiwan, as well as the governance strategies and outcomes that have been adopted in these regions. Drawing upon the concepts of risk governance and third-wave science studies, this research employs a variety of data collection methods including databases, historical literature, interviews, and both physical and virtual meetings. The findings reveal that, due to the governance systems, attitudes towards genetic modification, and positions in the agrochemical industry in the European Union, the United States, and Taiwan, Taiwan has struggled to establish a robust network of dissenting knowledge regarding glyphosate.

參考文獻


Atsuko, M.(2019)。〈四大公害病:經濟高速發展期遺留的負面遺產〉。日經新聞網:https://www.nippon.com/hk/in-depth/d00383/?pnum=1。2022/7/25檢索。
GMO面面觀(2012)。〈基改致癌報告受到莫名攻訐〉。環境資訊中心:https://e-info.org.tw/node/96488。2022/11/22檢索。
GMO面面觀(2021)。〈嘉磷塞的健康風險〉。GMO面面觀:http://gmo.agron.ntu.edu.tw/biosafety/glyphosate.htm。2021/12/2檢索。
Huang, A.(2018)。〈標榜「可以喝的除草劑」其實可能致癌,孟山都因「年年春」遭美判賠近90億〉。關鍵評論網:https://www.thenewslens.com/article/101766。2021/10/20檢索。
IC之音(2017)。〈除草劑OUT!-專訪台三線駐地工作站專案經理陳致中、割草大隊志工隊長黃政權、荒野保護協會新竹分會副會長許天麟〉。https://www.ic975.com/aod/%E6%84%9B%E4%B8%8A%E6%96%B0%E7%AB%B9/%E9%99%A4%E8%8D%89%E5%8A%91out%EF%BC%81%EF%BC%8D%E5%B0%88%E8%A8%AA%E5%8F%B0%E4%B8%89%E7%B7%9A%E9%A7%90%E5%9C%B0%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E7%AB%99%E5%B0%88%E6%A1%88%E7%B6%93%E7%90%86%E9%99%B3%E8%87%B4。2022/6/27檢索。

延伸閱讀