透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.134
  • 學位論文

如何在山上蓋房子?盤點山坡地建築規範演進及管制現況

How to Construct a Building on Slopes? The History of Hillside Building Norm and Situation of Regulation nowadays

指導教授 : 李建良

摘要


本論文之重點放在非都市土地之山坡地建築管制,以橫跨地理系、建築系、內政部建築研究所及法律系各專業領域的文獻分析作為研究方法,輔以最高行政法院106年度判字第706號判決的案例事實作為基礎,帶出山坡地建築規範階段性的管制歷史及因應法規交替所衍生而延續至今老丙建問題,以及目前我國對山坡地建築規範的管制流程,包含建築管制、國土計畫、用地編定、水土保持、環境影響評估、用地取得、既存違建合法化之方法等等。最後以此為據應用於前述的案例事實分析中,並試著討論案例當事人建築時間及訴訟策略採行的原因背景,最後並對管制現況給予建議。盼此篇論文能夠作為連結建築實務界及法律研究者之間的橋樑,使欲操作及檢討相關規範者,得以藉本文一窺山坡地建築的管制歷史及現況。

並列摘要


This essay mainly focus on the building regulation on hillside outside the urban planning division area. In the beginning, it tells readers the important of this topin by introducing readers illegal hillside building cases like the judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court No. 706 (December 14, 2017). The method of this researh is to study by reviewing essays from general professional area, such as Department of Geography, Department of Architecture, Ministry of the Interior, and Department of Law. Second, introducing the history of hillside building law and the problem of Old –type-C building lands. Third, it comes to the Situation of Regulation nowadays which included Building Act, Spatial Planning Act, Regional planning Act, Soil and Water Conservation Act, Environmental Impact Assessment Act, and the method to reverse illegal buildings to legal. Afterwards, by using all the materials above, we try to analyze why the plaintiff of the judgement we talked earlier insists the legality of the building permit. Finally, it comes to the conclusion about how to use this essay and the suggestions. I hope this essay could be the bridge connecting the practice of architecture and the theory of law by giving a glimpse of the history of hillside building law and situation of regulation nowadays.

參考文獻


王泓鑫(1999),《山坡地集合住宅社區開發管制之研究-由林肯大郡事件談起》,頁 14-222,國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
何彥陞(2013),〈都市建築強度管制之法制探究-以建蔽率與法定空地為中心〉,《台灣法學雜誌》,228 期,頁 105-117。
李建良(2009),〈公法類實務導讀(最高行政法院 98 年度判字第 452 號判決等 7 則裁判)〉,《台灣法學雜誌》,140期,頁 95-121。
李建良(2010),〈公法類實務導讀(最高行政法院 99 年度判字第 200 號判決等 5 則裁判之說明)〉,《臺灣法學雜誌》,155 期,頁 113-130。
李建良(2010),〈公法類實務導讀(最高行政法院 99 年度判字第 546 號等 4 則裁判及高等行政法院法律座談會紀錄之說明)〉,《台灣法學雜誌》,164期,頁 143-154。

延伸閱讀