透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.85.79
  • 學位論文

五螺箍筋柱反覆載重撓曲與偏心軸壓行為

Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Five-Spiral Reinforcement Under Cyclic and Eccentric Axial Loading

指導教授 : 歐昱辰

摘要


Multi-spiral transverse reinforced columns have been shown to outperform conventional rectilinear tie reinforced columns in seismic performance. This thesis intends to examine the flexural behavior of multi-spiral reinforced columns, particularly, the five-spiral transverse reinforcement for square columns. In the first phase, a method to determine the flexural capacity of five-spiral reinforced columns, which considers the confinement effect of the five-spirals, was introduced. Five small-scale columns were tested under increasing eccentric axial loading to validate the predicted axial-moment interaction of the five-spiral reinforced columns. In the second phase, large-scale flexure-critical five-spiral columns and equivalent conventional rectilinear tied columns were tested under low (0.1fca'Ag) and high (0.3fca'Ag) constant axial loads and subjected to double-curvature lateral cyclic loading. Test results showed that the five-spiral reinforced columns obtained higher flexural strength, superior ductility, larger drift capacity, and better equivalent damping ratios than counterpart conventional rectilinear tie reinforced columns, despite having 16% to 29% less transverse reinforcement. In addition, it was shown that code-based calculations of nominal moment strength can conservatively estimate the actual moment strength of five-spiral reinforced columns. On the other hand, among the existing code-based methods used in calculating the expected maximum moment of five-spiral columns, the Caltrans SDC 2019 method provided the most accurate prediction of the maximum flexural strength, followed by the AASHTO 2017 method, then the ACI 318-19 method. It was noted, however, that all three methods were not able to fully capture the superior confinement effect provided by the five-spiral reinforcement.

並列摘要


Multi-spiral transverse reinforced columns have been shown to outperform conventional rectilinear tie reinforced columns in seismic performance. This thesis intends to examine the flexural behavior of multi-spiral reinforced columns, particularly, the five-spiral transverse reinforcement for square columns. In the first phase, a method to determine the flexural capacity of five-spiral reinforced columns, which considers the confinement effect of the five-spirals, was introduced. Five small-scale columns were tested under increasing eccentric axial loading to validate the predicted axial-moment interaction of the five-spiral reinforced columns. In the second phase, large-scale flexure-critical five-spiral columns and equivalent conventional rectilinear tied columns were tested under low (0.1fca'Ag) and high (0.3fca'Ag) constant axial loads and subjected to double-curvature lateral cyclic loading. Test results showed that the five-spiral reinforced columns obtained higher flexural strength, superior ductility, larger drift capacity, and better equivalent damping ratios than counterpart conventional rectilinear tie reinforced columns, despite having 16% to 29% less transverse reinforcement. In addition, it was shown that code-based calculations of nominal moment strength can conservatively estimate the actual moment strength of five-spiral reinforced columns. On the other hand, among the existing code-based methods used in calculating the expected maximum moment of five-spiral columns, the Caltrans SDC 2019 method provided the most accurate prediction of the maximum flexural strength, followed by the AASHTO 2017 method, then the ACI 318-19 method. It was noted, however, that all three methods were not able to fully capture the superior confinement effect provided by the five-spiral reinforcement.

參考文獻


A. Nilson, D. Darwin and C. Dolan, Design of Concrete Structures, 14th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010, p. 795.
J. Wight and J. MacGregor, Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design, 6th ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2012, p. 1157.
ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI318R-19), Farmington Hills, Michigan: American Concrete Institute, 2019, p. 503.
Caltrans BDS, Bridge Design Specifications, Sacramento, California: California Department of Transportation, 2003, pp. 8-1 to 8-58.
S. Y.-L. Yin, T.-L. Wu, T. C. Liu, S. A. Sheikh and R. Wang, "Interlocking Spiral Confinement for Rectangular Columns," ACI Concrete International, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 38-45, 2011.

延伸閱讀