- 學位論文
監察院函請研提非常上訴案件之探析:2009年-2018年
A study on the extraordinary appeal cases of the Control Yuan’s claim from 2009 to 2018
摘要
非常上訴制度於學術之研究面向甚廣，可從制度面檢討其行使之主體、客體、對象、程序、權限與體制，亦可就實務面分析其效益、可行性及司法資源，甚或比較其與再審之分際，或與他國制度為比較分析。本論文從監察院職權行使角度切入，除從法律、學說與實務案例之研析結果，對監察權於非常上訴之角色扮演、權力行使分際及可行性進行論述外，並透過實務之統計分析結果，呈現監察權於非常上訴之行使現況與問題，目的在藉由研究以確認監察權於非常上訴制度之效益、影響及可行性，進而對制度面之改進與效益之提升作出建議。 本研究以98年至107年，此十年期間，監察院函送檢察總長研究是否提起非常上訴之案件，其調查方式、案件屬性、違背法令之理由及裁判結果等實務現象，探究監察權於非常上訴之行使效益、影響及爭議，全文共分六章，第一章為緒論，除說明本研究之動機與目的、研究途徑、方法及所受限制，亦對相關名詞作界定，並回顧權力分立理論，同時論述國內相關著作與文獻；第三章為探討監察院函送案件之處理情形，藉由統計數據呈現出該等案件之態樣、檢察機關或最高法院之後續處理結果；第四章為監察權於非常上訴之影響，論述該權力行使所產生之效益與影響力；第五章則從監察院函送案談若干存在實務上之問題；第六章為結論與建議，從前述章節所論述之實務狀況與問題，提出研究結論與後續研究建議。
並列摘要
The extraordinary appeal system provides a wide range of topics in academic research, such as system-level reviews of the subjects, objects, procedures, authority and systems, practical analysis of its efficacy, feasibility and judicial resources, the boundary between the re-examination or the comparison with other nations’ systems. From the perspective of Control Yuan’s exercise of powers, the paper discusses control power’s role, boundary and feasibility in the extraordinary appeal system based on a review of regulations, theories and case studies. It also presents the current situation and problems from empirical data analysis. The purpose of the study is to affirm the efficacy, effect and feasibility with respect to the exercise of control power in the extraordinary appeal system and therefore propose suggestions to improve the system and its effectiveness. The study explores the efficacy, effect and controversy regarding the control power’s exercise in the extraordinary appeal system by looking into the investigative approaches, characteristics of the cases, reasons against the law and conclusive judgements of the cases, which were sent by the Control Yuan to the Prosecutor General from 2009 to 2018 for filing extraordinary appeals. The study includes six chapters. The first chapter introduces the motivation, purpose, approach, methodology and limitations of the study. It also includes definitions of relevant terms, reviews on separation of powers and related domestic literature. The third chapter explores the handling of the cases that were sent from the Control Yuan, using the data to present the characteristics of the cases and follow-up results of the Prosecutors Offices or Supreme Court. The fourth chapter discusses the efficacy and effect of control power’s exercise in the extraordinary appeal system. The fifth chapter identifies a number of practical issues raised from the cases that were sent by the Control Yuan. The final chapter concludes with the findings of the study and provides suggestions for further research based on the current situation and practical issues mentioned in previous chapters.