- 學位論文
小坪數住宅空間設計評估指標之研究
A Proposed Evaluation Reference Frame for Compact Suite Design
摘要
近年來由於社會型態經濟的改變，隨著都市住宅高密度化、人口結構的改變、貧富差距拉大及「晚婚遲育」等原因。近年來標榜小豪宅的小坪數建案大行其道，甚至大幅影響以往以31至40坪物件主流產品的需求，隨著生活水準的提升，住居品質也日益受到重視，伴隨著住居需求的變化，民眾購屋朝「小宅化」及「豪宅化」兩極化發展的市場需求日益明顯。在此趨勢下，有效運用小坪數空間乃成為室內設計所面對的首要課題。 有鑑於此，本研究依據室內設計基本原理，藉由本人長期投入室內裝修實務經驗，經由指標初擬階段，可獲得「空間機能面」及「物理環境面」兩大構面，計十九項指標。「空間機能面」之「挑高夾層」與「收納」為小坪數創造空間最有利的因素，而「機能疊加空間多元使用」及「動線層次化之空間規劃」為掌握小坪數夾層挑高空間之初次與二次設計上的差異及二次設計的設計重點，依此原則來篩選評估指標。 從評估指標初擬區分到篩選，本人對指標的範圍已有初步的界定。我們進一步將這些指標與組成元素作交叉比對，得出指標與評估項目之對應關係，再以評估項目所賦予之內涵及專業判斷訂出權重，並區分必要性與一般性之比例，最後製表來呈現小坪數住宅評估指標之全貌。希望此舉能有效率的展現室內設計專業與提升居往品質有所貢獻。
並列摘要
As a result of the social economic change, the high density urban residential, the population structure change, the enlarging gap between the rich and the poor, and the late marriage and nurtures, the compact suites has becoming popular in the recent years, which even influence the thirty-one ping and the forty ping mainstream product demand. As the promotion of living standard, the housing quality has become more and more important. Along with the change in housing demand, it is quite obvious in the housing market demand day by day that consumers buying houses polarized from the small dwelling to the mansion. Under this trend, how to differentiate good composite suits design from others becomes critical in interior design. In view of this, the study not only based on basic principles of interior design, but also take the stance of the author’s practical experience. In conclusion, nineteen indicators of the spatial function and the physical environment are developed. Mezzanine and collecting in the spatial function are the most advantageous factors in creating spaces for the compact suites. The multi space function usages and the mobilized space plan master the differences of compact suites between the original and the second designs, and also the design point of the second design. Following the principle, evaluating indicators will be selected . From the distinction and screening of evaluating indicators, the range of indicators are preliminarily defined. Furthermore, by crossing the indicators and composite elements, the relationship between the indicators and the evaluating items can be obtained. Then it is weighted and proportioned by the content of the evaluating items and the professional judgments. Finally, tabulation shows the whole picture of indicators in compact suites.