人工植牙用骨鑽幾何設計與研磨

Design and Grinding of Surgical Drill Geometry for the Dental Implant

吳仕隆(Wu Shr Lung)

指導教授 ： 阮岱珈

共同指導教授 ： 李炳寅(Bean-Yin Lee)

國立虎尾科技大學/工程學院/機械與機電工程研究所/碩士(2014年)

https://doi.org/10.6827/NFU.2014.00017

摘要

近年來由於工業技術發展迅速，金屬加工仍為機械產業重要的一環，而刀具在金屬加工中扮演為極為重要的角色。刀具之設計研磨是刀具製造最後也最重要過程，也是決定刀具幾何形狀精度及切削性能之關鍵，然而醫療用切削器材為一結合多項產業及技術所發展出來的終端產品，因此牽連的相關產業亦非常多，許多先進科技也逐步應用於醫療器材產品的開發上。
牙科所使用之鑽頭也不單是以金屬材質為導向，牙科產品使用上人命關天，因此對於產品的安全性和效能要求需要更為謹慎。本研究將使用五軸CNC工具磨床結合刀具研磨軟體規劃與分析人工植牙用骨鑽刀具，以鑽頭磨耗、鑽孔數量以及手感來評估骨鑽的品質。本計畫應可建構出人工植牙用骨鑽的設計與研磨模式。

關鍵字

工具磨床 ； 植牙 ； 鑽頭

並列摘要

In recent years, due to the rapid development of industrial technology, metal processing machinery industry is essential and cutting tools play a very important role in metal processing. Since the design and grinding of end-mill are the last and the most important processing in tool manufacture. However, for the end product of the cutting tools for health care industry, many industries and technologies need to be integrated. Therefore, it implicates many related industries.
Then, many advanced technologies are gradually applied for the product development of medical equipment. The dental-drill is not a single metal material,and its utilization is related to the human life, therefore, prudential requirements of safety and performance for dental-drill. This study aims at using a five-axis CNC tool grinder and open-based software to plan and analyze the grinding processes for surgical drills. The tool wear, number of drilled hole and handle feeling would be employed as a quality characteristic to evaluate the experimental results. The design and grinding model of surgical drill for dental implant could be constructed with the experimental experiences and analyses.

並列關鍵字

Tool grinder ； Dental Implants ； Drill

參考文獻

[4]T. Jemt and U. Lekholm, “Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption,” International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1995, Vol.10, No.3, pp.303-11.

[6]R. A. Jaffin and C. L. Berman, “The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis,” Journal of Periodontology 1991, Vol.62, No.1, pp.2-4.

[7]P. Trisi and W. Rao, “Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 1999, Vol.10, No.1, pp.1-7.

[8]P. Homolka, A. Beer, W. Birkfellner, R. Nowotny, A. Gahleitner and M. Tschabitscher, “Bone mineral density measurement with dental quantitative CT prior to dental implant placement in cadaver mandibles: pilot study,” Radiology 2002, Vol.224, No.1, pp.247-52.

[9]Beer, A. Gahleitner, A. Holm, M. Tschabitscher and P. Homolka, “Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 2003, Vol.14, No.5, pp.616-20.