- 學位論文
一般民眾對濕地生態旅遊發展之研究-以雲林縣口湖鄉為例
A Study on Ecotourism Development Between Tourist and Wetland－A Case Studyof Kouhu Township, Yunlin County, Taiwan
摘要
利用統計分析T檢定探討遊客社經背景、遊客遊憩特性與濕地生態旅遊認知而獲悉三者間的關係與變數內外在互相間的差異，結果概述如下:1.社經背景除了職業外其他皆與其他兩大構面皆有差異，至於來訪的遊客分析得出皆鄰近縣市居民居多，是故有地利之便。2.關於遊客之遊憩特性中，遊客中聽過濕地生態旅遊，但不曾參與過生態旅遊之人及不曾參與過環境保護或自然保育之社團的人數佔大多數，可能對於認知生態旅遊只有些微的概念，故影響實際參與的程度。再者，對於此濕地旅遊的預算不高，發展一定規模之機會不高(以目前而言)。3.遊客濕地生態旅遊之認知多注重保育的概念與環境倫理，由此可見濕地設置任何人工地景皆不認同，至於人文面則應尊重當地人的生活方式，其此帶來經濟效益應妥善回饋到社區居民本身。 總之，此研究結果提供對政府相關單位之參考，可以更深入調查分析與建立口湖濕地生態資源庫，提供成為特色休憩景點規劃之新亮點。研究中也發現應建立利益回饋的機制，促進居民的收入與就業機會，確保當地居民的主導與管理，及推動居民主動對環境保育與生態旅遊之宣導教育。最重要政府應正面積極看待濕地相關活動，即應真正要開始起而行，不應該再只流於形式而無行動力，除論述外，應該著手建構逐步解構的計畫與整合建構，如此才能落實真正善待自己是要需從善待自己的母親「居住的大地」開始，過去執行計劃中與溼地相關計畫有些與休閒農漁業景觀有關，然未與濕地生態旅遊多面向相串連而產生實質效益，同時口湖鄉濕地是否需要進行保護的措施及保護的功能及效益為何？也只有準則條例並未進一步分析，所以仍需努力完善之，才能從事濕地生態旅遊同時亦實現友善濕地環境。
並列摘要
To understand whether it was different significantly among traveler background, recreactional trait and cognition/perception by T test alaysis, the results were predicted as follows: 1. except for visitor’s profession, two dimensions, recreactional trait and cognition, showed up differently through questionaires’ data analysed, most of them came here wetland to travel from neighborhood citizen because of their convience for tourment. 2. In according to recreactional trait of wetland ecotourism for visitors, they could not participate any ecotourism tour or relative nature conservation association, so did they be affected to enjoy the action. Moreover, as well might they be interest low to schedule the program, because they would offer the low payment from the wetland ecotourism tour. 3. The visitos came here wetland for recreactional acivities, their cognition was predicted to concern much about nature conservation and environmental ethic through analysis statisticaliy. Too much artificial landscape it wouldn’t be appropriated for the local live geographically. Before, so as to provide economic benefit for local resident and its community, did the wetland ecotourism ought to repect their own life style. To sum up, the results provided some positive suggestions for planning wetland to ecological recreaction, it included the advance investigation and systematic wetland ecology for interpretating natural education and would be new light for local ecotourism. At the same one, promoting income and more job opportunities for local resident did it be provided by feedback mechanism with local power and reasonable management to wetland. However it was not only a slogan, it would acted to accomplish the friend wetland during ecotourism. In fact the research told 3 dimenssions about wetland ecotourism they provided ecotourism informatioms, understanding what visitor background, recreactional trait and cognition they were, that might be helpful to follow up for friendly wetland.