目的:本研究之目的在瞭解團體治療過程中,中文版團體氣氛量表之信度及效度。方法:本研究運用門診憂鬱症動力性人際關係團體心理治療資料,檢定中文版團體氣氛量表之內部信度及建構效度。結果:中文版團體氣氛量表之投入、衝突及逃避之內部一致性檢定Cronbach alpha係數分別為0.89、0.83及0.20;折半信度(split-half reliability)分別為0.81、0.83及0.06。經由因素分析可以發現量表包含投入、衝突及逃避等三個主要因素,但逃避的題項則與原始分類有較大的差異。結論:中文版團體氣氛量表透過本研究的信效度檢定,發現投入及衝突有良好的信度及效度,可以廣泛運用在團體治療之評估上,逃避的題項則需調整。
Object: The purpose of this research was to validate the Chinese version Group Climate Questionnaire.Method: We tested the internal reliability and construct validity by analyzing the data from dynamic interpersonal group psychotherapy in the outpatient clinic.Result: The internal consistency Cronbach alpha coefficients of engagement, conflict and avoidance were 0.89, 0.83 and 0.20. The Guttman Split-Half Coefficients of split-half reliability were 0.81, 0.83 and 0.06 for engagement, conflict and avoidance, respectively. By factor analysis, we found 3 components including engagement, conflict and avoidance. Items of engagement and conflict were compatible with the original English version but items of avoidance were not.Conclusion: The subscales of Chinese version Group Climate Questionnaire including engagement and conflict have good reliability and validity. It is appropriate to apply these 2 subscales in the evaluation of groups. The avoidant subscale needs some adjustment for further clinical application.